140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9919349)
21. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ?
Denny LA; Soeters R; Dehaeck K; Bloch B
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jul; 102(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 7647056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The use of carbon-dioxide laser surgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix.
Favalli G; Lomini M; Schreiber C; Ciravolo G; Junasevic J; Pecorelli S; Bianchi UA
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 10375929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. "See and treat" approach is appropriate in women with high-grade lesions on either cervical cytology or colposcopy.
Aue-Aungkul A; Punyawatanasin S; Natprathan A; Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1723-6. PubMed ID: 22126552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Wait-and-see policy versus loop excision after two consecutive Pap-2 cervical smears: over time less surgery and an equivalent outcome; no substantial contribution to be expected from the detection of high risk human papillomavirus].
Bekkers RL; Hanselaar AG; Melchers WJ; van Schaik JH; Boonstra H; Massuger LF
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Feb; 147(7):302-6. PubMed ID: 12622008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by laser vaporization.
Jordan JA; Woodman CB; Mylotte MJ; Emens JM; Williams DR; MacAlary M; Wade-Evans T
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Apr; 92(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 3986168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?
Numnum TM; Kirby TO; Leath CA; Huh WK; Alvarez RD; Straughn JM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 15870514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Management of Early Cervical Stromal Invasion FIGO Stage 1A1 When Margins Are Involved With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Nicholson RC; Twigg J; Roberts A; Angelopoulos G; Cruickshank D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2018 Apr; 22(2):129-131. PubMed ID: 29474238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Recurrence of high-grade cervical abnormalities following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2.
Wilkinson TM; Sykes PH; Simcock B; Petrich S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):769.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25582099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Differentially expressed proteins among normal cervix, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Zhao Q; He Y; Wang XL; Zhang YX; Wu YM
Clin Transl Oncol; 2015 Aug; 17(8):620-31. PubMed ID: 25893434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Secondary excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: an evaluation of two treatment methods.
Bowring J; Tulloch I; Phadnis SV; Young MP; Evans H; Walker P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 20604658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of the diagnosis in suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.
Myllynen L; Karjalainen O
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 6732157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Gardeil F; Barry-Walsh C; Prendiville W; Clinch J; Turner MJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 89(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 9052597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cone biopsy and hysterectomy in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jones HW
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Mar; 9(1):221-36. PubMed ID: 7600728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Morphological observation of cone biopsy and hysterectomy specimens of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Chen XD; Shi HY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 43(6):429-32. PubMed ID: 19035137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prognostic value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of clinical evolution in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) treated by cervical conization.
Cardoso FA; Campaner AB; Silva MA
APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 23763281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dysplasia and early neoplasia of the uterine cervix. A review.
Briggs RM
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1979 Jan; 34(1):70-99. PubMed ID: 375145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
