These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9919380)

  • 21. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test.
    Soli SD; Wong LL
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 18569108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Audiovisual perception of speech in noise and masked written text.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 18091101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.
    Hällgren M; Larsby B; Arlinger S
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):227-37. PubMed ID: 16684704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The "cost" of silence.
    Tsaneva L; Danev S
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2002 Jun; 10(1-2):32-4. PubMed ID: 12096682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech perception in noise for children with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony type hearing loss.
    Rance G; Barker E; Mok M; Dowell R; Rincon A; Garratt R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 17485984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception.
    Cooke M; Garcia Lecumberri ML; Barker J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):414-27. PubMed ID: 18177170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of perceived spatial separation on informational masking of Chinese speech.
    Wu X; Wang C; Chen J; Qu H; Li W; Wu Y; Schneider BA; Li L
    Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 15574295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Loudness scaling for narrow band noise and speech signal].
    Prosser S; Rosignoli M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Dec; 18(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 10388150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of short-term auditory masking on fundamental frequency variability.
    Rastatter M; Rivers C
    J Aud Res; 1983 Jan; 23(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 6677636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech-in-noise intelligibility does not correlate with efferent olivocochlear reflex in humans with normal hearing.
    Wagner W; Frey K; Heppelmann G; Plontke SK; Zenner HP
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jan; 128(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17851961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of speech noise on vocal fundamental frequency using power spectral analysis.
    Lee GS; Hsiao TY; Yang CC; Kuo TB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 17485983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Synthetic speech and its perception in complex acoustic conditions].
    Tarasenko GI; Shcherbachenko GE; Petlenko IA
    Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med; 1989; 23(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 2709749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The effect of different masking noises on psychophysiological tasks].
    Tsaneva L; Danev S; Dinkova K
    Probl Khig; 1995; 20():109-15. PubMed ID: 8524732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of the discomfort threshold of command board operators in automated productions with respect to its application in professional selection.
    Tzaneva L
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 1996 Sep; 4(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 8884052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Composite model for human performance in continuous noise.
    Poulton EC
    Psychol Rev; 1979 Jul; 86(4):361-75. PubMed ID: 396542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.