These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9919381)

  • 21. Masking effect of music upon oral information processing.
    Tsaneva L
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2003 Sep; 11(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 14514173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The noise-suppression capacity of the auditory analyzer for interfering speech in one's native and in an unknown language].
    Tatevosian GI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1994; (2):14-7. PubMed ID: 7855991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility.
    Dubbelboer F; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3937-46. PubMed ID: 19206818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech-in-noise intelligibility does not correlate with efferent olivocochlear reflex in humans with normal hearing.
    Wagner W; Frey K; Heppelmann G; Plontke SK; Zenner HP
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jan; 128(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17851961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
    Kjems U; Boldt JB; Pedersen MS; Lunner T; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test.
    Soli SD; Wong LL
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 18569108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of envelope discontinuities on perceptual restoration of amplitude-compressed speech.
    Başkent D; Eiler C; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3995-4005. PubMed ID: 19507981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hearing aid low frequency cut: effect on Mandarin tone and vowel perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Zhang J; McPherson B
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 18446038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers.
    Rajan R; Cainer KE
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(2):784-95. PubMed ID: 18485606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech intelligibility in difficult signal/noise circumstances.
    Kiukaanniemi H; Sorri M
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1988; 30():215-8. PubMed ID: 3227274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise.
    Lu Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3261-75. PubMed ID: 19045809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Loudness scaling for narrow band noise and speech signal].
    Prosser S; Rosignoli M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Dec; 18(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 10388150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: dependency on signal-to-noise ratios.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):531-9. PubMed ID: 22280614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Female voice communications in high levels of aircraft cockpit noises--Part I: spectra, levels, and microphones.
    Nixon CW; Morris LJ; McCavitt AR; McKinley RL; Anderson TR; McDaniel MP; Yeager DG
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1998 Jul; 69(7):675-83. PubMed ID: 9681374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Synthetic speech and its perception in complex acoustic conditions].
    Tarasenko GI; Shcherbachenko GE; Petlenko IA
    Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med; 1989; 23(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 2709749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.