57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9921617)
1. Differential attenuation imaging for the characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound lesions.
Ribault M; Chapelon JY; Cathignol D; Gelet A
Ultrason Imaging; 1998 Jul; 20(3):160-77. PubMed ID: 9921617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real-time implementation of a dual-mode ultrasound array system: in vivo results.
Casper AJ; Liu D; Ballard JR; Ebbini ES
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 60(10):2751-9. PubMed ID: 23708766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Pawlicki AD; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):233-50. PubMed ID: 22518954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple ultrasonic parametric imaging for the detection and monitoring of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation.
Yang G; Liu J; Yang B; Guo J; Wu C; Zhang B; Zhang S
Ultrasonics; 2024 Apr; 139():107274. PubMed ID: 38428161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating the total ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path by using a reference phantom.
Labyed Y; Bigelow TA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3232-8. PubMed ID: 21110618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Challenges of conducting quantitative ultrasound with a multimodal optical imaging system.
Pinkert MA; Hall TJ; Eliceiri KW
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jan; 66(3):035008. PubMed ID: 33171448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of the algorithms for estimating the ultrasonic attenuation along the propagation path.
Labyed Y; Bigelow TA
Ultrasonics; 2012 Aug; 52(6):720-9. PubMed ID: 22424697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time domain attenuation estimation method from ultrasonic backscattered signals.
Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):533-43. PubMed ID: 22779499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Optimization of Transcostal Phased Array Refocusing Using the Semidefinite Relaxation Method.
Almekkawy M; Ebbini ES
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):318-328. PubMed ID: 31567081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spectral-based Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging Processing Techniques: Comparisons of RF Versus IQ Approaches.
Liu M; Kou Z; Zhao Y; Wiskin JW; Czarnota GJ; Oelze ML
Ultrason Imaging; 2024 Mar; 46(2):75-89. PubMed ID: 38318705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro and in vivo characterization of a cranial window prosthesis for diagnostic and therapeutic cerebral ultrasound.
Prada F; Franzini A; Moosa S; Padilla F; Moore D; Solbiati L; DiMeco F; Legon W
J Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 134(2):646-658. PubMed ID: 31899872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Ultrasound Attenuation Imaging Using a Linear versus a Conventional Convex Probe: A Volunteer Study.
Hänni O; Ruby L; Paverd C; Frauenfelder T; Rominger MB; Martin A
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Apr; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 38732301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Improved Strategy for Detection and Localization of Nodules in Liver Tissues by a 16 MHz Needle Ultrasonic Probe Mounted on a Robotic Platform.
Bulletti A; Mazzoni M; Prasanna S; Massari L; Menciassi A; Oddo CM; Capineri L
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 32098102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating dynamic changes of tissue attenuation coefficient during high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment.
Rahimian S; Tavakkoli J
J Ther Ultrasound; 2013; 1():14. PubMed ID: 25516802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound attenuation measurements using a reference phantom with sound speed mismatch.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Rubert NC; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):251-63. PubMed ID: 22518955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-frequency ultrasound m-mode imaging for identifying lesion and bubble activity during high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation.
Kumon RE; Gudur MS; Zhou Y; Deng CX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):626-41. PubMed ID: 22341055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation.
Omari E; Lee H; Varghese T
Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visualization of HIFU-induced lesion boundaries by axial-shear strain elastography: a feasibility study.
Thittai AK; Galaz B; Ophir J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):426-33. PubMed ID: 21276656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR-guided transcranial brain HIFU in small animal models.
Larrat B; Pernot M; Aubry JF; Dervishi E; Sinkus R; Seilhean D; Marie Y; Boch AL; Fink M; Tanter M
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):365-88. PubMed ID: 20019400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
