These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9922424)

  • 1. Marginal gap of crowns made with a phosphate-bonded investment and accelerated casting method.
    Schilling ER; Miller BH; Woody RD; Miller AW; Nunn ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Feb; 81(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 9922424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated on three different marginal designs using conventional and accelerated casting techniques: an in vitro study.
    Vaidya S; Parkash H; Bhargava A; Gupta S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):641-7. PubMed ID: 25511066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvement to the marginal coping fit of commercially pure titanium cast in phosphate-bonded investment by using a simple pattern coating technique.
    Pieralini AR; Nogueira F; Ribeiro RF; Adabo GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 22765986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of ringless casting and accelerated wax-elimination technique: a comparative in vitro study.
    Prasad R; Al-Keraif AA; Kathuria N; Gandhi PV; Bhide SV
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 23889829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Over-refractory casting technique as an alternative to one-piece multi-unit fixed partial denture frameworks.
    de Oliveira Correa G; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Sobrinho LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16543023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal fit and surface roughness of crowns made with an accelerated casting technique.
    Konstantoulakis E; Nakajima H; Woody RD; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Sep; 80(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 9760367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of impression materials and techniques on the marginal fit of metal castings.
    Gelbard S; Aoskar Y; Zalkind M; Stern N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jan; 71(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8120837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Precision of fit of two margin designs for metal-ceramic crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 17451481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
    Morgano SM; Milot P; Ducharme P; Rose L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of investment type and sprue number on the casting accuracy of titanium crown margins.
    Leal MB; Paulino SM; Pagnano VO; Bezzon OL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16399274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relating the marginal fit of the castings to the accuracy of the impressions made from laminated hydrocolloid impression technique: a comparative study.
    Sinha MR; Thakur B; Gaikwad A; Chaudhari LD; Kulkarni A; Kulkarni H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Mar; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22665742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of marginal gap of Ni-Cr copings made with conventional and accelerated casting techniques.
    Tannamala PK; Azhagarasan NS; Shankar KC
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):147-8. PubMed ID: 23852254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Analysis of Marginal Accuracy of Complete Crowns Fabricated by Using Ringless and Metal Ring Investment Systems: An
    Saini N; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Tyagi R; Malethia A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):852-856. PubMed ID: 33568604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of frequency and amplitude of vibration on void formation in dies poured from polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Abdullah MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):490-4. PubMed ID: 9791799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.