BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9922429)

  • 1. Modeling of jaw biomechanics in the reconstructed mandibulectomy patient.
    Curtis DA; Plesh O; Hannam AG; Sharma A; Curtis TA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Feb; 81(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 9922429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Muscle and joint forces under variable equilibrium states of the mandible.
    Rues S; Lenz J; Türp JC; Schweizerhof K; Schindler HJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):737-47. PubMed ID: 20585815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Occlusal load modelling significantly impacts the predicted tooth stress response during biting: a simulation study.
    Saini H; Ackland DC; Gong L; Cheng ; Röhrle O
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 May; 23(7):261-270. PubMed ID: 31965827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular forces during simulated tooth clenching.
    Korioth TW; Hannam AG
    J Orofac Pain; 1994; 8(2):178-89. PubMed ID: 7920353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of implant placement in the reconstructed mandible.
    Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Kawana H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):999-1005. PubMed ID: 20162103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual variations in numerically modeled human muscle and temporomandibular joint forces during static biting.
    Iwasaki LR; Thornton BR; McCall WD; Nickel JC
    J Orofac Pain; 2004; 18(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 15509003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Stress distribution of mandible under different loading and biting condition].
    Wang H; Chen MS; Tian WD; Li SW
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Jul; 35(4):516-9. PubMed ID: 15291115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing the anterior component of occlusal force.
    Southard TE; Southard KA; Stiles RN
    J Biomech; 1990; 23(12):1199-207. PubMed ID: 2292599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical behavior of mandibles reconstructed with fibular grafts at different vertical positions using finite element method.
    Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang JH; Jun JC; Jiang XF; Wang R; Baur DA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 30482534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandibular kinematics and maximum voluntary bite force following segmental resection of the mandible without or with reconstruction.
    Linsen SS; Oikonomou A; Martini M; Teschke M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1707-1716. PubMed ID: 29116495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stability of the mandibular position in occlusion of mandibulectomy patients with lateral discontinuity defect.
    Taniguchi H; Ishiwata H; Ohyama T; Shinozuka O
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Nov; 24(11):849-56. PubMed ID: 9426167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The comparison of angular and curvilinear marginal mandibulectomy on force distribution with three dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ertem SY; Uckan S; Ozden UA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):e54-8. PubMed ID: 22890086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Study on mandibular movement trajectory and virtual occlusal pre-adjustment under light and heavy bite force].
    Zhu JY; Wang JJ; Wang YX; Yang JW; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 58(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 36642452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effect of change in occlusal contact areas of the mandibular second molar on temporomandibular joint stress distribution: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Zhang Y; Wang MQ; Ling W
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 40(4):291-3. PubMed ID: 16191369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro strain measurements in the condylar process of the human mandible.
    Throckmorton GS; Dechow PC
    Arch Oral Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):853-67. PubMed ID: 7741655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of cusp and jaw morphology on the forces on teeth and the temporomandibular joint.
    Katona TR
    J Oral Rehabil; 1989 Mar; 16(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 2715869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occlusal force after mandibular advancement in adult rhesus monkeys.
    Dechow PC; Carlson DS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Nov; 44(11):887-93. PubMed ID: 3464713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distribution of occlusal forces during occlusal adjustment of dental implant prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis considering the capacity for displacement of opposing teeth and implants.
    Kasai K; Takayama Y; Yokoyama A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 22442771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kinematic analysis of mandibular motion before and after mandibulectomy and mandibular reconstruction in dogs.
    Arzi B; Verstraete FJM; Garcia TC; Lee M; Kim SE; Stover SM
    Am J Vet Res; 2019 Jul; 80(7):637-645. PubMed ID: 31246128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of clenching intensity on bite force balance, occlusal contact area, and average bite pressure.
    Hidaka O; Iwasaki M; Saito M; Morimoto T
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1336-44. PubMed ID: 10403461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.