156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9922612)
1. Cusp fracture resistance in composite-amalgam combined restorations.
Franchi M; Breschi L; Ruggeri O
J Dent; 1999 Jan; 27(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 9922612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resin composite reinforcement of undermined enamel.
Abu-Hanna AA; Mjör IA
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 15088737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations: a combined in vivo and in vitro study.
Di Lenarda R; Cadenaro M; Gregorig G; De Stefano Dorigo E
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 11317396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of root-canal treated mandibular molars with intracoronal restorations: effect of thermocycling and mechanical loading.
Hitz T; Ozcan M; Göhring TN
J Adhes Dent; 2010 Aug; 12(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 20157655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives.
al-Moayad M; Aboush YE; Elderton RJ
Br Dent J; 1993 Nov; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations.
Eidelman E; Holan G; Tanzer-Sarneh S; Chosack A
Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 2216907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal morphology of Class V composite restorations.
Prati C; Chersoni S; Cretti L; Mongiorgi R
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):231-6. PubMed ID: 9522697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of air abrasion and resin composite on microleakage of Class V restorations bonded with self-etching primers.
Hannig M; Fu B
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 11803714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repair of non-carious amalgam margin defects.
Roberts HW; Charlton DG; Murchison DF
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 11357570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
