These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9922612)

  • 1. Cusp fracture resistance in composite-amalgam combined restorations.
    Franchi M; Breschi L; Ruggeri O
    J Dent; 1999 Jan; 27(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 9922612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resin composite reinforcement of undermined enamel.
    Abu-Hanna AA; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 15088737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations: a combined in vivo and in vitro study.
    Di Lenarda R; Cadenaro M; Gregorig G; De Stefano Dorigo E
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 11317396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
    Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of root-canal treated mandibular molars with intracoronal restorations: effect of thermocycling and mechanical loading.
    Hitz T; Ozcan M; Göhring TN
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Aug; 12(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 20157655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives.
    al-Moayad M; Aboush YE; Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1993 Nov; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations.
    Eidelman E; Holan G; Tanzer-Sarneh S; Chosack A
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 2216907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal morphology of Class V composite restorations.
    Prati C; Chersoni S; Cretti L; Mongiorgi R
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):231-6. PubMed ID: 9522697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
    Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of air abrasion and resin composite on microleakage of Class V restorations bonded with self-etching primers.
    Hannig M; Fu B
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 11803714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repair of non-carious amalgam margin defects.
    Roberts HW; Charlton DG; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 11357570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.