These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9922612)

  • 21. In vitro analysis of the effects of acid or laser etching on microleakage around composite resin restorations.
    Yazici AR; Frentzen M; Dayangac B
    J Dent; 2001 Jul; 29(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 11472808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The comparative evaluation of fracture resistance and microleakage in bonded amalgam, amalgam, and composite resins in primary molars.
    Vanishree HS; Shanthala BM; Bobby W
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 26672412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Composite resin support of undermined enamel in amalgam restorations.
    Eidelman E
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 10197337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Roulet J
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interfacial adaptation of a Class II polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restoration in vivo.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2000 Apr; 58(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 10894429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams.
    Boyer DB; Roth L
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 8054193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
    Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage.
    Opdam NJ; Feilzer AJ; Roeters JJ; Smale I
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations.
    Arola D; Galles LA; Sarubin MF
    J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 11137640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
    Krifka S; Anthofer T; Fritzsch M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations.
    Manhart J; Chen HY; Mehl A; Weber K; Hickel R
    J Dent; 2001 Feb; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 11239587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations.
    Bonilla E; White SN
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 9011846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum.
    Demarco FF; Ramos OL; Mota CS; Formolo E; Justino LM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11357567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope.
    Niranjan B; Shashikiran ND; Singla S; Thakur R; Dubey A; Maran S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 27681395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.