These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9923954)

  • 1. The impact of obstetric risk factors and socioeconomic characteristics on utilization of antenatal care.
    Berglund A; Lindmark G
    J Public Health Med; 1998 Dec; 20(4):455-62. PubMed ID: 9923954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomised controlled trial of a reduced-visits programme of antenatal care in Harare, Zimbabwe.
    Munjanja SP; Lindmark G; Nyström L
    Lancet; 1996 Aug; 348(9024):364-9. PubMed ID: 8709734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Under-attending free antenatal care is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.
    Raatikainen K; Heiskanen N; Heinonen S
    BMC Public Health; 2007 Sep; 7():268. PubMed ID: 17900359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical, provider and sociodemographic predictors of late initiation of antenatal care in England and Wales.
    Kupek E; Petrou S; Vause S; Maresh M
    BJOG; 2002 Mar; 109(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 11950181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is antenatal care apportioned according to obstetric risk? The Scottish antenatal care study.
    Tucker J; Florey CD; Howie P; McIlwaine G; Hall M
    J Public Health Med; 1994 Mar; 16(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 8037955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neuroticism is associated with higher antenatal care utilization in obstetric low-risk women.
    Axfors C; Hellgren C; Volgsten H; Skoog Svanberg A; Ekselius L; Wikström AK; Ramklint M; Skalkidou A; Sundström-Poromaa I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Apr; 98(4):470-478. PubMed ID: 30457176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced prevalence of small-for-gestational-age and preterm birth for women of low socioeconomic position: a population-based cohort study comparing antenatal midwifery and physician models of care.
    McRae DN; Janssen PA; Vedam S; Mayhew M; Mpofu D; Teucher U; Muhajarine N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e022220. PubMed ID: 30282682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The pattern of antenatal visits with emphasis on gestational age at booking in Riyadh Health Centres.
    al-Shammari SA; Khoja T; Jarallah JS
    J R Soc Health; 1994 Apr; 114(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 8021892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health services effects of a reduced routine programme for antenatal care. An area-based study.
    Berglund AC; Lindmark GC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Apr; 77(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 9578278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical, provider and sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales.
    Petrou S; Kupek E; Vause S; Maresh M
    Soc Sci Med; 2001 Apr; 52(7):1123-34. PubMed ID: 11266054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Number of antenatal visits and women's opinion.
    Hildingsson I; Rådestad I; Waldenström U
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Mar; 84(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 15715532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Somali women's use of maternity health services and the outcome of their pregnancies: a descriptive study comparing Somali immigrants with native-born Swedish women.
    Råssjö EB; Byrskog U; Samir R; Klingberg-Allvin M
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2013 Oct; 4(3):99-106. PubMed ID: 24041730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison outcomes of sick babies born to teenage mothers with those born to adult mothers.
    Chotigeat U; Sawasdiworn S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Aug; 94 Suppl 3():S27-34. PubMed ID: 22043751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Socioeconomic status can affect pregnancy outcomes and complications, even with a universal healthcare system.
    Kim MK; Lee SM; Bae SH; Kim HJ; Lim NG; Yoon SJ; Lee JY; Jo MW
    Int J Equity Health; 2018 Jan; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 29304810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National Health Insurance and the antenatal care use: a case in Taiwan.
    Chen CS; Liu TC; Chen LM
    Health Policy; 2003 Apr; 64(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 12644332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antenatal health care policy, services and clients in urban Papua New Guinea.
    Marshall LB; Lakin JA
    Int J Nurs Stud; 1984; 21(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 6562080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does antenatal care make a difference to safe delivery? A study in urban Uttar Pradesh, India.
    Bloom SS; Lippeveld T; Wypij D
    Health Policy Plan; 1999 Mar; 14(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 10351468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence and risk factors for non-use of antenatal care visits: analysis of the 2010 South Sudan household survey.
    Mugo NS; Dibley MJ; Agho KE
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Mar; 15():68. PubMed ID: 25885187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors predicting antenatal hospital admission in pregnancy.
    Rostad B; Schei B
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 1998 Jun; 16(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 9689685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Provider adherence to first antenatal care guidelines and risk of pregnancy complications in public sector facilities: a Ghanaian cohort study.
    Amoakoh-Coleman M; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Agyepong IA; Kayode GA; Grobbee DE; Ansah EK
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Nov; 16(1):369. PubMed ID: 27881104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.