These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9925026)

  • 1. The existence region of Huggins' pitch.
    Culling JF
    Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):143-8. PubMed ID: 9925026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-individual differences in binaural detection of low-frequency or high-frequency tonal signals masked by narrow-band or broadband noise.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C; Hyde EL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2069-78. PubMed ID: 9566329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency discrimination duration effects for Huggins pitch and narrowband noise (L).
    Plack CJ; Turgeon M; Lancaster S; Carlyon RP; Gockel HE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 21302981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can dichotic pitches form two streams?
    Akeroyd MA; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):977-81. PubMed ID: 16158653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.
    Cokely JA; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 2030220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.
    Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thresholds for segregating a narrow-band from a broadband noise based on interaural phase and level differences.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Feb; 89(2):838-44. PubMed ID: 2016433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dichotic pitches as illusions of binaural unmasking. I. Huggins' pitch and the "binaural edge pitch".
    Culling JF; Summerfield AQ; Marshall DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3509-26. PubMed ID: 9637035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):306-16. PubMed ID: 1737879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interaural correlation sensitivity.
    Culling JF; Colburn HS; Spurchise M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1020-9. PubMed ID: 11519570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels.
    Stillman JA; Irwin RJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 2326150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subcomponent cues in binaural unmasking.
    Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3846-55. PubMed ID: 21682408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection and F0 discrimination of harmonic complex tones in the presence of competing tones or noise.
    Micheyl C; Bernstein JG; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1493-505. PubMed ID: 17004471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monaural and interaural temporal modulation transfer functions measured with 5-kHz carriers.
    Stellmack MA; Viemeister NF; Byrne AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2507-18. PubMed ID: 16266171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masking effects in binaural detection and interaural time discrimination.
    Koehnke J; Cohen MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):724-9. PubMed ID: 3584680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pitch discrimination interference between binaural and monaural or diotic pitches.
    Gockel HE; Carlyon RP; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):281-90. PubMed ID: 19603884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural responses in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level differences created by inverting the noise in one ear.
    Palmer AR; Jiang D; McAlpine D
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Aug; 84(2):844-52. PubMed ID: 10938311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.