203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9925695)
1. Influence of endoscopic biopsy forceps characteristics on tissue specimens: results of a prospective randomized study.
Woods KL; Anand BS; Cole RA; Osato MS; Genta RM; Malaty H; Gurer IE; Rossi DD
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 9925695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Oval Cup Forceps Versus Serrated Jaw Forceps in Gastric Biopsy.
Sussman DA; Deshpande AR; Shankar U; Barkin JA; Medina AM; Poppiti RJ; Cubeddu LX; Barkin JS
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Aug; 61(8):2338-2343. PubMed ID: 27003145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective, randomized, pathologist-blinded study of disposable alligator-jaw biopsy forceps for gastric mucosal biopsy.
Abudayyeh S; Hoffman J; El-Zimaity HT; Graham DY
Dig Liver Dis; 2009 May; 41(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 18799373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An observer-blinded, prospective, randomized comparison of forceps for endoscopic esophageal biopsy.
Schafer TW; Hollis-Perry KM; Mondragon RM; Brann OS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11818921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps.
Cartwright JA; Hill TL; Smith S; Shaw D
J Vet Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 30(4):1002-7. PubMed ID: 27255591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of endoscopic forceps on quality of duodenal mucosal biopsy in healthy dogs.
Goutal-Landry CM; Mansell J; Ryan KA; Gaschen FP
J Vet Intern Med; 2013; 27(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 23600705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective, randomized comparison of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Yang R; Naritoku W; Laine L
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(6):671-4. PubMed ID: 7859962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy.
Chu KM; Yuen ST; Wong WM; Wong KW; Lai KC; Hu WH; Leung SY; Yuen MF; Lam SK; Wong BC
Endoscopy; 2003 Apr; 35(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 12664392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes: a prospective study on 1335 specimens.
Walter T; Chesnay AL; Dumortier J; Mège-LeChevallier F; Hervieu V; Guillaud O; Lapalus MG; Lépilliez V; Fumex F; Ponchon T; Scoazec JY
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19661817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of endoscopic and capsule small intestinal biopsy techniques in children with upper gastrointestinal disorders.
Eltumi MA; Ong PS; Francis ND; Brueton MJ
J Paediatr Child Health; 1996 Jun; 32(3):255-6. PubMed ID: 8827546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens: comparison between a conventional biopsy forceps and multibite forceps.
Fantin AC; Neuweiler J; Binek JS; Suter WR; Meyenberger C
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Nov; 54(5):600-4. PubMed ID: 11677476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adequacy of mucosal sampling with the "two-bite" forceps technique: a prospective, randomized, blinded study.
Padda S; Shah I; Ramirez FC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Feb; 57(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 12556778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial.
Rizzo J; Bernstein D; Gress F
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10699767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Jumbo forceps are superior to standard large-capacity forceps in obtaining diagnostically adequate inflammatory bowel disease surveillance biopsy specimens.
Elmunzer BJ; Higgins PD; Kwon YM; Golembeski C; Greenson JK; Korsnes SJ; Elta GH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Aug; 68(2):273-8; quiz 334, 336. PubMed ID: 18155204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technicalities of endoscopic biopsy.
Tytgat GN; Ignacio JG
Endoscopy; 1995 Nov; 27(9):683-8. PubMed ID: 8903983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adequacy of disposable biopsy forceps for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a direct comparison with reusable forceps.
Yang R; Vuitch F; Wright K; McCarthy J
Gastrointest Endosc; 1990; 36(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 2210280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic multiple biopsy and rapid diagnosis by in situ fixation and histopathologic processing.
Zimmon DS; Smith FB; Manheimer F; Fan C; Njiwaji C; Aksenov S; Chattoo P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):333-342. PubMed ID: 27988287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of three types of biopsy forceps in the endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus.
Dolwani S; Saleem H; Thompson IW; Allison MC
Endoscopy; 2002 Dec; 34(12):946-9. PubMed ID: 12471536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of standard single-bite with multiple-bite biopsy forceps for collection of gastrointestinal biopsies in dogs: a prospective study.
Edery EG; Scase T; Kisielewicz C; Dhumeaux MP
Vet Rec; 2018 Nov; 183(20):624. PubMed ID: 30115670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical aspects in endoscopic biopsy of lesions in esophageal pemphigus vulgaris.
Galloro G; Diamantis G; Magno L; Inzirillo M; Mignogna MC; Mignogna C; De Rosa G; Iovino P
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Apr; 39(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 17307037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
