These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9925953)

  • 1. What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters?
    Millet B; Dejonckere PH
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1998; 50(6):305-10. PubMed ID: 9925953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
    Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: correlation with acoustic parameters and reliability].
    Núñez Batalla F; Corte Santos P; Sequeiros Santiago G; Señaris González B; Suárez Nieto C
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2004; 55(6):282-7. PubMed ID: 15491116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and clinical relevance of perceptual evaluation of pathological voices.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(4):247-8. PubMed ID: 9865100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 11051513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier-Buchman L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1996; 117(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9102729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part I: perceptual and computer performances in cycle pattern recognition.
    Dejonckere P; Schoentgen J; Giordano A; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Manfredi C
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 21689056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].
    Ptok M; Schwemmle C; Iven C; Jessen M; Nawka T
    HNO; 2006 Oct; 54(10):793-802. PubMed ID: 16132879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual characteristics of adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
    Langeveld TP; Drost HA; Frijns JH; Zwinderman AH; Baatenburg de Jong RJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2000 Aug; 109(8 Pt 1):741-8. PubMed ID: 10961807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia.
    Webb AL; Carding PN; Deary IJ; MacKenzie K; Steen N; Wilson JA
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 261(8):429-34. PubMed ID: 14615893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Study on the stability of perceptual evaluation of voice quality].
    Wang G; Yu P; Xu W; Wen W; Wei CS; Huang DY; Hou LZ
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 46(6):485-90. PubMed ID: 21924100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic measurement of voice quality in central dysphonia.
    Hartmann E; von Cramon D
    J Commun Disord; 1984 Nov; 17(6):425-40. PubMed ID: 6520236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The INFVo perceptual rating scale for substitution voicing: development and reliability.
    Moerman M; Martens JP; Crevier-Buchman L; de Haan E; Grand S; Tessier C; Woisard V; Dejonckere P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 263(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 16404623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
    Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new voice rating tool for clinical practice.
    Gould J; Waugh J; Carding P; Drinnan M
    J Voice; 2012 Jul; 26(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 22209058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Spectrographic study of voice disorders: subharmonics].
    Núñez Batalla F; Suárez Nieto C; Muñoz Pinto C; Baragaño Río L; Alvarez Zapico MJ; Martínez Ferreras A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2000; 51(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10799933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Disorder in Children Who Have Had Laryngotracheal Reconstruction Surgery and the Relationship Between Clinician Perceptual Ratingof Voice Quality and Parent Proxy/Child Self-Report of Voice-Related Quality of Life.
    Cohen W; Lloyd S; Wynne DM; Townsley RB
    J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):945.e27-945.e35. PubMed ID: 30146234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2201-11. PubMed ID: 15898661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance.
    Dejonckere PH; Obbens C; de Moor GM; Wieneke GH
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1993; 45(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 8325573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.