These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 992617)
1. Control system ensures documentation of care. Taylor JD Hospitals; 1976 Dec; 50(23):83-5. PubMed ID: 992617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: "Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target" (J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1:497-505). Stolberg HO J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Sep; 1(9):700-1. PubMed ID: 17411684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study. Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advances in documentation: the impact of service and empowerment. Bifano J; Orloff L Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 Feb; 14(3):43-7. PubMed ID: 10131591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The confidentiality dilemma. Opp M Mod Healthc (Short Term Care); 1975 May; 3(5):49-54. PubMed ID: 236502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of nursing home medical record information about care-process delivery: implications for staff management and improvement. Schnelle JF; Bates-Jensen BM; Chu L; Simmons SF J Am Geriatr Soc; 2004 Aug; 52(8):1378-83. PubMed ID: 15271130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceived quality benefits influenced by usefulness and documentation accuracy of information systems. McDowell DE; Dillon TW; Lending D Comput Inform Nurs; 2008; 26(6):350-7. PubMed ID: 19047884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Involve physicians and coders in measuring and improving clinical outcomes. Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Feb; 25(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 11183854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality assurance in outpatient medical records. Murphy G Top Health Rec Manage; 1990 Mar; 10(3):59-69. PubMed ID: 10103930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Considering qualitative standards for health care data. Sheehy KH J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):31-7. PubMed ID: 10309863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality assessment: monitoring and evaluating medical record documentation and services. Curtis EH Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Sep; 10(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 10294810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical data systems: meeting organizational needs. Small P Top Health Rec Manage; 1982 Mar; 2(3):9-17. PubMed ID: 10254655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A basic system for improving quality of care in nursing homes. Lee BA; Lee WA Med Rec News; 1979 Feb; 50(1):39-41, 44, 46-51 passim. PubMed ID: 10240199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Home care project survey data. Part I. Miller S J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Nov; 56(11):21-4. PubMed ID: 10274536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Denver areawide health data management system. Giebink GA; Foreman C; Hurst L; Hulac S Med Care; 1973; 11(2):Suppl:170-7. PubMed ID: 4692406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Innovations: medical record standards compliance as a function of selected staff variables. Casper ES Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Jun; 9(4):79-89. PubMed ID: 10293514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Documentation errors are easy to avoid and correct. Hosp Case Manag; 2003 Sep; 11(9):140-2. PubMed ID: 12931506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Do hospital staff interfere with computer system implementation? Dowling AF Health Care Manage Rev; 1980; 5(4):23-32. PubMed ID: 7000734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]