These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9926633)

  • 1. Space analysis: a comparison between sonic digitization (DigiGraph Workstation) and the digital caliper.
    Mok KH; Cooke MS
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Dec; 20(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 9926633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study.
    Schirmer UR; Wiltshire WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 9423701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of mesiodistal crown dimension and arch width in subjects with and without hypodontia.
    Fekonja A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Jun; 25(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 23773516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of cephalometric analysis using a non-radiographic sonic digitizer (DigiGraph Workstation) with conventional radiography.
    Tsang KH; Cooke MS
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10191573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
    El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
    Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between mandibular anterior crowding and lateral dentofacial morphology in the early mixed dentition.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):759-64. PubMed ID: 15673137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Average arch widths and associated changes between initial, post-treatment and post-retention measurements.
    Dostalova T; Racek J; Tauferova E; Smutny V
    Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 15798824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra-arch occlusal indicators of crowding in the permanent dentition.
    Bernabé E; del Castillo CE; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 16102408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Credibility of Pont's index in Egyptian population.
    Zahw EK; Albelasy NF; Fouda AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):1008. PubMed ID: 39210365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between rapid and mixed maxillary expansion through an assessment of arch changes on dental casts.
    Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Jamilian A; Femiano F; Favero L; Perillo L
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():20. PubMed ID: 26122076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variations in tooth size and arch dimensions in Malay schoolchildren.
    Hussein KW; Rajion ZA; Hassan R; Noor SN
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 20043553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Jelusic D; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 22051488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
    Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental crowding in primary dentition and its relationship to arch and crown dimensions among preschool children of Davangere.
    Prabhakar AR; Ravi GR; Kurthukoti AJ; Shubha AB
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 18647513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lower dental arch changes after bilateral third molar removal.
    Stanaitytė R; Trakinienė G; Gervickas A
    Stomatologija; 2014; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 24824058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.