These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9926634)

  • 1. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II--The soft tissues.
    Morris DO; Illing HM; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Dec; 20(6):663-84. PubMed ID: 9926634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.
    Illing HM; Morris DO; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 9825553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An extended period of functional appliance therapy: a controlled clinical trial comparing the Twin Block and Dynamax appliances.
    Lee RT; Barnes E; DiBiase A; Govender R; Qureshi U
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Oct; 36(5):512-21. PubMed ID: 23291502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes induced by bionator therapy.
    Malta LA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Faltin K; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19852634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 2351200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.
    de Almeida MR; Flores-Mir C; Brandão AG; de Almeida RR; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18575306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the twin block appliance in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients. A systematic review.
    Flores-Mir C; Major PW
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):876-81. PubMed ID: 17029526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reaction of facial soft tissues to treatment with a Herbst appliance.
    Meyer-Marcotty P; Kochel J; Richter U; Richter F; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Apr; 73(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 22391787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes.
    Sharma AA; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 15821692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective optical surface scanning and cephalometric assessment of the effect of functional appliances on the soft tissues.
    McDonagh S; Moss JP; Goodwin P; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Apr; 23(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 11398549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A controlled clinical trial of the effects of the Twin Block and Dynamax appliances on the hard and soft tissues.
    Lee RT; Kyi CS; Mack GJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Jun; 29(3):272-82. PubMed ID: 17456506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in soft tissue profile using functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Stamenković Z; Raičković V; Ristić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(1-2):12-5. PubMed ID: 25845246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Soft tissue angle evaluation of fixed Twin-Block appliance treatment and tooth extraction treatment in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Gong Y; Li PL; Wang HH; Yu Q; Wei B; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Feb; 25(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 27063315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft tissue effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 21357655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ehsani S; Nebbe B; Normando D; Lagravere MO; Flores-Mir C
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 25052373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cephalometric changes during treatment with the open bite bionator.
    Weinbach JR; Smith RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Apr; 101(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 1558066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of the amount of protrusion built into the bionator on condylar growth and displacement: a clinical study.
    Op Heij DG; Callaert H; Opdebeeck HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 May; 95(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 2718970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial changes in children treated with the Activator appliance: a lateral cephalometric study.
    Mamandras AH; D'Aloisio DR; Lenizky RJ
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1989 Sep; 55(9):727-30. PubMed ID: 2676117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.