These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9926639)

  • 61. Gingival labial recessions and the post-treatment proclination of mandibular incisors.
    Renkema AM; Navratilova Z; Mazurova K; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 25481921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Influence of magnification and superimposition of structures on cephalometric diagnosis.
    Paula LK; Solon-de-Mello Pde A; Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 25992984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Relationship between anterior occlusion and frontal sinus size.
    Said OT; Rossouw PE; Fishman LS; Feng C
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):752-758. PubMed ID: 28622014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Heritability of teeth angulation and inclination in patients with overt malocclusion.
    Boss H; Al-Qawasmi RA; Park JH; Kulbersh R
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):529-537. PubMed ID: 31279755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 7942657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Relapse and stability after mandibular setback surgery one year postoperatively: a retrospective study.
    Halvorsen ET; Beddari IY; Schilbred Eriksen E; Boe OE; Wisth PJ; Loes S; Moen K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1181.e1-11. PubMed ID: 24831939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures.
    Karaman AI
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 12169035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Relationships between mandibular symphysis morphology and lower incisor inclination in skeletal class III malocclusion requiring orthognathic surgery.
    Nojima K; Nakakawaji K; Sakamoto T; Isshiki Y
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Aug; 39(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 9927903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Simão TM; Barros SE; Janson M; de Freitas MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 21490991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A cephalometric evaluation of patients presenting with persistent digit sucking habits.
    Moore MB; McDonald JP
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 9088599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Shape variation and covariation of upper and lower dental arches of an orthodontic population.
    Papagiannis A; Halazonetis DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 25840587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Cephalometric study of slow maxillary expansion in adults.
    Cao Y; Zhou Y; Song Y; Vanarsdall RL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 19732668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Combination of maxillary and mandibular inclination in children with skeletal Class I, II and III relationship].
    Tijanić LJ; Janosević M
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1989; 22(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 2638166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods.
    Ongkosuwito EM; Katsaros C; van 't Hof MA; Bodegom JC; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Dec; 24(6):655-65. PubMed ID: 12512783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A comparison of two- and three-dimensional incisor angles.
    Richmond S; Jones ML
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Apr; 12(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 3859331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Wear in the upper and lower incisors in relation to incisal and condylar guidance.
    Bauer W; van den Hoven F; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 1997; 58(6):306-19. PubMed ID: 9433050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The tooth-width relation of the incisors in closed bite.
    Schuster G
    J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 10220977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Lower incisor position in different malocclusions and facial patterns.
    Hernández-Sayago E; Espinar-Escalona E; Barrera-Mora JM; Ruiz-Navarro MB; Llamas-Carreras JM; Solano-Reina E
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 Mar; 18(2):e343-50. PubMed ID: 23229262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study.
    Schirmer UR; Wiltshire WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 9423701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.