These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9926771)

  • 1. Factors affecting implant mobility at placement and integration of mobile implants at uncovering.
    Orenstein IH; Tarnow DP; Morris HF; Ochi S
    J Periodontol; 1998 Dec; 69(12):1404-12. PubMed ID: 9926771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-year post-placement survival of implants mobile at placement.
    Orenstein IH; Tarnow DP; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 11885180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability of the bone-implant complex. Results of longitudinal testing to 60 months with the Periotest device on endosseous dental implants.
    Truhlar RS; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 11885181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival and stability (PTVs) of six implant designs from placement to 36 months.
    Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11885174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variables affecting survival of single-tooth hydroxyapatite-coated implants in anterior maxillae at 3 years.
    Orenstein IH; Petrazzuolo V; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 11885184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.
    Morris HF; Winkler S; Ochi S
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 12500876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
    Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ankylos endosseous dental implant: assessment of stability up to 18 months with the Periotest.
    Morris HF; Winkler S; Ochi S
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 11831235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Periodontal-type measurements associated with hydroxyapatite-coated and non-HA-coated implants: uncovering to 36 months.
    Morris HF; Ochi S; Spray JR; Olson JW
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 11885182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering.
    Spray JR; Black CG; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 11885170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter.
    Winkler S; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 11885179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
    Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
    Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
    J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. HA-coated implants: warranted or not?
    Lozada JL; James RA; Boskovic M
    Compend Suppl; 1993; (15):S539-43; quiz S565-6. PubMed ID: 8187139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of installation depth on survival of an hydroxyapatite-coated Bicon implant for single-tooth restoration.
    Lee EH; Ryu SM; Kim JY; Cho BO; Lee YC; Park YJ; Kim SG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1345-52. PubMed ID: 20356664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
    Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up.
    Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stability of implants and natural teeth as determined by the Periotest over 60 months of function.
    Winkler S; Morris HF; Spray JR
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 12500879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of smoking on 3-year clinical success of osseointegrated dental implants.
    Lambert PM; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 11885185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.