These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

574 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9926885)

  • 1. Fetal loss rate after second trimester amniocentesis at different gestational age.
    Saltvedt S; Almström H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Jan; 78(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9926885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk factors for procedure-related fetal losses after mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis.
    Kong CW; Leung TN; Leung TY; Chan LW; Sahota DS; Fung TY; Lau TK
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Oct; 26(10):925-30. PubMed ID: 16838383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnancy outcome following second-trimester amniocentesis: a case-control study.
    Müngen E; Tütüncü L; Muhcu M; Yergök YZ
    Am J Perinatol; 2006 Jan; 23(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16450269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The diagnostic potential of amniocentesis in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy].
    Bartosch B; Klein M; Beck A; Schnedl W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Nov; 51(11):886-9. PubMed ID: 1773923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fear of pregnancy loss and fetal karyotyping: a place for third-trimester amniocentesis?
    Picone O; Senat MV; Rosenblatt J; Audibert F; Tachdjian G; Frydman R
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17934295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-operator comparison of early and mid-second-trimester amniocentesis.
    Assel BG; Lewis SM; Dickerman LH; Park VM; Jassani MN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):940-4. PubMed ID: 1579318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Late first-trimester invasive prenatal diagnosis: results of an international randomized trial.
    Philip J; Silver RK; Wilson RD; Thom EA; Zachary JM; Mohide P; Mahoney MJ; Simpson JL; Platt LD; Pergament E; Hershey D; Filkins K; Johnson A; Shulman LP; Bang J; MacGregor S; Smith JR; Shaw D; Wapner RJ; Jackson LG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1164-73. PubMed ID: 15172848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic amniocentesis: gestation-specific pregnancy outcome and comparison of outcome following early and traditional amniocentesis.
    Roper EC; Konje JC; De Chazal RC; Duckett DP; Oppenheimer CA; Taylor DJ
    Prenat Diagn; 1999 Sep; 19(9):803-7. PubMed ID: 10521835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations: a comparison between second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling.
    Wapner RJ; Johnson A; Davis G; Urban A; Morgan P; Jackson L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 82(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8515925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis--a current audit. A review of 2000 cases of prenatal cytogenetic diagnoses after amniocentesis, and comparisons with early experience.
    Bell JA; Pearn JH; Wilson BH; Ansford AJ
    Med J Aust; 1987 Jan; 146(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 3796389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of the third trimester amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping in women with fear of pregnancy loss].
    Picone O; Fuchs F; Sénat MV; Brisset S; Tachdjian G; Audibert F; Fernandez H; Frydman R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Jun; 37(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 18191913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe?
    Seeds JW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 191(2):607-15. PubMed ID: 15343248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual risk of fetal loss following routine second trimester amniocentesis: a controlled study of 20,460 cases.
    Kozlowski P; Knippel A; Stressig R
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Apr; 29(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 17602371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early amniocentesis.
    Henry GP; Miller WA
    J Reprod Med; 1992 May; 37(5):396-402. PubMed ID: 1507188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Eddleman KA; Malone FD; Sullivan L; Dukes K; Berkowitz RL; Kharbutli Y; Porter TF; Luthy DA; Comstock CH; Saade GR; Klugman S; Dugoff L; Craigo SD; Timor-Tritsch IE; Carr SR; Wolfe HM; D'Alton ME
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 17077226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A single physician's experience with four thousand six hundred genetic amniocenteses.
    Horger EO; Finch H; Vincent VA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 185(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 11518880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early amniocentesis: report of 407 cases with neonatal follow-up.
    Penso CA; Sandstrom MM; Garber MF; Ladoulis M; Stryker JM; Benacerraf BB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1032-6. PubMed ID: 2234711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective study of amniocentesis performed between weeks 9 and 16 of gestation: its feasibility, risks, complications and use in early genetic prenatal diagnosis.
    Elejalde BR; de Elejalde MM; Acuña JM; Thelen D; Trujillo C; Karrmann M
    Am J Med Genet; 1990 Feb; 35(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 2309757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prenatal genetic diagnosis in 350 amniocenteses.
    Crandall BF; Lebherz TB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Aug; 48(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 133307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Early amniocentesis for cytogenetic diagnosis].
    Lindner C; Hüneke B; Masson D; Schlotfeldt T; Kerber S; Held KR
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Dec; 50(12):954-8. PubMed ID: 1707842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.