189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9927090)
1. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A perceptibility curve comparison of Ultra-speed and Ektaspeed Plus films.
Tjelmeland EM; Moore WS; Hermesch CB; Buikema DJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):485-8. PubMed ID: 9574962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography.
Yoshiura K; Stamatakis H; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD; Kristoffersen J; Tronje G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9693524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the image quality of a CCD-based digital intraoral radiography system: application of perceptibility curve test.
Hayakawa Y; Kitagawa H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K; Welander U
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2000 Feb; 41(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11212381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
Ludlow JB; Platin E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of Flow and Kodak dental X-ray films by means of perceptibility curves.
Svenson B; Petersson A
Acta Odontol Scand; 1993 Apr; 51(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8498162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceptibility.
Yoshiura K; Okamura K; Tokumori K; Nakayama E; Chikui T; Goto TK; Shimizu M; Kawazu T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Nov; 34(6):350-2. PubMed ID: 16227477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A laboratory evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray film.
Horner K; Rushton VE; Shearer AC
J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 8530727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic contrast. A comparative study of three dental X-ray films.
Tamburus JR; Lavrador MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 9442609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film.
Ludlow J; Mol A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 11174581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical study of the sensitivity and dynamic range of three digital systems, E-speed film and digitized film.
Bóscolo FN; Oliveira AE; Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11696917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitometric comparison of Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed Dental Films.
Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 7614149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response.
Li G; Welander U; Yoshiura K; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 15070839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of storage conditions on film characteristics of Ektaspeed plus and Ultra-speed films.
Platin E; Nesbit SP; Ludlow JB
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 130(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 10036844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
