These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9927090)

  • 21. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
    Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceived quality of radiographic images after rapid processing of D- and F-speed direct-exposure intraoral x-ray films.
    Bernstein DI; Clark SJ; Scheetz JP; Farman AG; Rosenson B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 14561976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perceptibility curve test for conventional and colour-coded radiographs.
    Shi XQ; Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 15585809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differences in aluminum equivalent values of endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography.
    Baksi BG; Sen BH; Eyuboglu TF
    J Endod; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1101-4. PubMed ID: 18718374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films.
    Svenson B; Lindvall AM; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8508944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimated skin exposure as an indicator for comparing radiovisiography (RVG) versus conventional Ektaspeed Plus dental radiography.
    Jones GA; Schuman NJ; Woods MA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 9643185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The accuracy of an x-ray film quality-assurance step-wedge test.
    Bloxom RM; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Oct; 62(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 3464919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
    Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms.
    Alpöz E; Soğur E; Baksi Akdeniz BG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):490-4. PubMed ID: 18033946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kuroyanagi K; Rumack PM; Schick DB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9446976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility.
    Shi XQ; Benchimol D; Nasstrom K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130249. PubMed ID: 24404600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of developer exhaustion on Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed dental films.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 7614150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A sensitometric comparison of four dental X-ray films and their diagnostic accuracy.
    Svenson B; Welander U; Shi XQ; Stamatakis H; Tronje G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9442614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contrast perception in digitized panoramic radiographs compared with their film-based origin.
    Schulze RK; Rosing ST; D'Hoedt B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Sep; 94(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 12324798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis.
    Nair MK; Nair UP
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensitometric and clinical evaluation of a new F-speed dental X-ray film.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 11175272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of developer depletion on image quality of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus films.
    Casanova MS; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15314003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Objective and subjective evaluations of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus dental x-ray film.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Anthony D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 7614190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.