238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9927091)
1. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical study of the sensitivity and dynamic range of three digital systems, E-speed film and digitized film.
Bóscolo FN; Oliveira AE; Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11696917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography.
Yoshiura K; Stamatakis H; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD; Kristoffersen J; Tronje G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9693524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
McDonnell D; Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics.
Bhaskaran V; Qualtrough AJ; Rushton VE; Worthington HV; Horner K
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 16104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the image quality of a CCD-based digital intraoral radiography system: application of perceptibility curve test.
Hayakawa Y; Kitagawa H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K; Welander U
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2000 Feb; 41(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11212381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional and predicted perceptibility curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs.
Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; Li G; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Okamura K; McDavid WD; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 11681484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms.
Alpöz E; Soğur E; Baksi Akdeniz BG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):490-4. PubMed ID: 18033946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
Anissi HD; Geibel MA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra-oral computed radiography--an in vitro evaluation.
Lim KF; Loh EE; Hong YH
J Dent; 1996 Sep; 24(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 8916652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A comparative study of analog and digital intraoral x-ray image detector systems].
Blendl C; Stengel C; Zdunczyk S
Rofo; 2000 Jun; 172(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 10916550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is digital better in dental radiography?
Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
