156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9927911)
1. Clinical evaluation of a hybrid composite and a polyacid-modified composite resin in Class-II restorations in deciduous molars.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Hellwig E
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 9927911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical performance of Class II adhesive restorations in pulpectomized primary molars: 12-month results.
Zulfikaroglu BT; Atac AS; Cehreli ZC
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 18505646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in class I and class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 24-month results.
dos Santos MP; Passos M; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):156-66; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 19188412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
Hübel S; Mejàre I
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study.
Andersson-Wenckert IE; Folkesson UH; van Dijken JW
Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Aug; 55(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 9298168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longevity of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite restoring non-carious cervical lesions in a general dental practice.
Smales RJ; Ng KK
Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 15762341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results.
Hse KM; Wei SH
J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Aug; 128(8):1088-96. PubMed ID: 9260418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
