These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9927923)

  • 1. Weight and linear dimensional changes of reversible hydrocolloid duplicating materials: effect of storage and re-use.
    Sofou A; Kotsiomiti E; Farmakis N; Kapari D
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Jun; 6(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 9927923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between pH changes and dimensional stability in irreversible hydrocolloid impression material during setting.
    Anastassiadou V; Dolopoulou V; Kaloyannides A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 8595113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids.
    Sedda M; Casarotto A; Raustia A; Borracchini A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 18473028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of four polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Pant R; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 18433976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Irreversible hydrocolloid and gypsum interactions.
    Reisbick MH; Johnston WM; Rashid RG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 9484064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional accuracy of 2 irreversible hydrocolloid alternative impression materials with immediate and delayed pouring.
    Nassar U; Hussein B; Oko A; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2012; 78():c2. PubMed ID: 22322019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional stability of newer alginate impression materials over seven days.
    Wandrekar S; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Dec; 18(4):163-70. PubMed ID: 21265435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptation of finger-smoothed irreversible hydrocolloid to impression surfaces.
    Lim PF; Neo KH; Sitoh L; Yeo KL; Stokes A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7575961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of bound and unbound water in dental alginate irreversible hydrocolloid by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
    Fellows CM; Thomas GA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):486-93. PubMed ID: 19019419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Some effects of disinfecting solutions on the properties of alginate impression material and dental stone.
    Boden J; Likeman P; Clark R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001; 9(3-4):131-5. PubMed ID: 12192949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of three methods for preparing reversible hydrocolloid duplicating material.
    Wilhelm MW; Andres CJ; Brown DT; Munoz CA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 8778377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional stability of contemporary irreversible hydrocolloids: humidor versus wet tissue storage.
    Erbe C; Ruf S; Wöstmann B; Balkenhol M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 22867808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of two different disinfectants on dimensional stability of newer alginate impression materials over five days.
    Ambrose PK; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Dec; 19(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 22645797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of water quality on setting of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.
    Bradna P; Cerna D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 17174662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts.
    al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Wood DJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 10218014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part II: Linear dimensional change and accompanying weight change.
    Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Sep; 13(3):150-9. PubMed ID: 15345014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.