These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9928802)

  • 1. Influence of patch-test application tape on reactions to sodium dodecyl sulfate.
    Fischer T; Dahlén A; Bjarnason B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jan; 40(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 9928802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate?
    Aramaki J; Effendy I; Happle R; Kawana S; Löffler C; Löffler H
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Nov; 45(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 11722488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro testing of tensides employing monolayer cultures: a comparison with results of patch tests on human volunteers.
    Benassi L; Bertazzoni G; Seidenari S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jan; 40(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 9928803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Profile of irritant patch testing with detergents: sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate and alkyl polyglucoside.
    Löffler H; Happle R
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jan; 48(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 12641575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
    Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
    Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of irritant contact dermatitis produced by repeat patch test with sodium lauryl sulfate and assessed by visual methods, transepidermal water loss, and laser Doppler velocimetry.
    Freeman S; Maibach H
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Sep; 19(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 3049697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between 2 test models in evaluating the effect of a moisturizer on irritated human skin.
    Held E; Agner T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 May; 40(5):261-8. PubMed ID: 10344481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The "strip" patch test: results of a multicentre study towards a standardization.
    Dickel H; Bruckner TM; Erdmann SM; Fluhr JW; Frosch PJ; Grabbe J; Löffler H; Merk HF; Pirker C; Schwanitz HJ; Weisshaar E; Brasch J
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2004 Oct; 296(5):212-9. PubMed ID: 15293061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate: interrelation between concentration and exposure time.
    Aramaki J; Löffler C; Kawana S; Effendy I; Happle R; Löffler H
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Nov; 145(5):704-8. PubMed ID: 11736892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skin reaction and recovery: a repeated sodium lauryl sulphate patch test vs. a 24-h patch test and tape stripping.
    Koopman DG; Kezić S; Verberk MM
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Mar; 150(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 15030332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.
    Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biophysical characterization of skin damage and recovery after exposure to different surfactants.
    Bárány E; Lindberg M; Lodén M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Feb; 40(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 10048655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of dark test-substance pigmentation on skin perfusion assessments and effect of test technique on balsam of Peru patch-test results.
    Bjarnason B; Flosadóttir E; Fischer T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jun; 42(6):318-25. PubMed ID: 10871094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Irritancy ranking of anionic detergents using one-time occlusive, repeated occlusive and repeated open tests.
    Tupker RA; Bunte EE; Fidler V; Wiechers JW; Coenraads PJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jun; 40(6):316-22. PubMed ID: 10385334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Basal transepidermal water loss, skin thickness, skin blood flow and skin colour in relation to sodium-lauryl-sulphate-induced irritation in normal skin.
    Agner T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Aug; 25(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 1935039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skin susceptibility of atopic individuals.
    Löffler H; Effendy I
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 May; 40(5):239-42. PubMed ID: 10344477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair. Evaluation of the acute human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Jun; 30(6):944-9. PubMed ID: 8188884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Susceptibility to cumulative and acute irritant dermatitis. An experimental approach in human volunteers.
    Lammintausta K; Maibach HI; Wilson D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 3180788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective assessment of nickel sulfate patch test reactions with laser Doppler perfusion imaging.
    Bjarnason B; Fischer T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Sep; 39(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 9771983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stratum corneum integrity as a predictor for peristomal skin problems in ostomates.
    Nybaek H; Lophagen S; Karlsmark T; Bang Knudsen D; Jemec GB
    Br J Dermatol; 2010 Feb; 162(2):357-61. PubMed ID: 19811497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.