102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9929139)
1. Adaptive spatial filtering technique for storage phosphor radiography in portable chest radiographs: parameter optimization.
Murayama S; Murakami J; Tanaka J; Sakai S; Hashiguchi N; Masuda K
Radiat Med; 1998; 16(6):405-10. PubMed ID: 9929139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.
Miró SP; Leung AN; Rubin GD; Choi YH; Kee ST; Mindelzun RE; Stark P; Wexler L; Plevritis SK; Betts BJ
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two K versus 4 K storage phosphor chest radiography: detection performance and image quality.
Koelblinger C; Prokop M; Weber M; Sailer J; Cartes-Zumelzu F; Schaefer-Prokop C
Eur Radiol; 2007 Nov; 17(11):2934-40. PubMed ID: 17492289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal subtraction for the detection of hazy pulmonary opacities on chest radiography.
Tsubamoto M; Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Honda O; Mihara N; Koyama M; Maeda M; Nakamura H; Fujiwara K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):467-71. PubMed ID: 12130454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease.
Schaefer CM; Greene R; Oestmann JW; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Pile-Spellman ER; Rubens JR
Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 2294549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital chest radiography: comparison of unprocessed and processed images in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules.
Correa J; Souto M; Tahoces PG; Malagari KS; Tucker DM; Larkin JJ; Kuhlman J; Barnes GT; Zerhouni EA; Fraser RG
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):253-8. PubMed ID: 7892481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of an automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiographs].
Abe K; Katsuragawa S; Sasaki Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 52(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 1561056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chest radiography with a shaped filter at 140 kVp: its diagnostic accuracy compared with that of standard radiographs.
Guilbeau JC; Mazoyer BM; Pruvost P; Verrey B; Grenier P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1007-10. PubMed ID: 3258700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs.
Prokop M; Schaefer CM; Oestmann JW; Galanski M
Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 8475301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality and dose differences caused by vendor-specific image processing of neonatal radiographs.
Sensakovic WF; O'Dell MC; Letter H; Kohler N; Rop B; Cook J; Logsdon G; Varich L
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Oct; 46(11):1606-13. PubMed ID: 27488507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of digital with film radiographs for the classification of pneumoconiotic pleural abnormalities.
Larson TC; Holiday DB; Antao VC; Thomas J; Pinheiro G; Kapil V; Franzblau A
Acad Radiol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 22098943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography.
Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rubens JR; Pile-Spellman E; Hall D; Robertson C; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Potsaid M; White G
Invest Radiol; 1989 Sep; 24(9):643-6. PubMed ID: 2807816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New techniques in chest radiography.
Glazer HS; Muka E; Sagel SS; Jost RG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1994 Jul; 32(4):711-29. PubMed ID: 8022976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities.
Fischbach F; Freund T; Röttgen R; Engert U; Felix R; Ricke J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1519-24. PubMed ID: 14627567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
MacMahon H; Doi K; Sanada S; Montner SM; Giger ML; Metz CE; Nakamori N; Yin FF; Xu XW; Yonekawa H
Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A fully automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiograph.
Abe K; Katsuragawa S; Sasaki Y; Yanagisawa T
Invest Radiol; 1992 Jan; 27(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 1733884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
