These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9929139)

  • 41. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study.
    van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of scanning equalization and conventional chest radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
    Radiology; 1989 Sep; 172(3):641-5. PubMed ID: 2772170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
    Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
    Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; John V; Gocke P
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Effect of Supplementary Bone-Suppressed Chest Radiographs on the Assessment of a Variety of Common Pulmonary Abnormalities: Results of an Observer Study.
    Schalekamp S; Karssemeijer N; Cats AM; De Hoop B; Geurts BH; Berger-Hartog O; van Ginneken B; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    J Thorac Imaging; 2016 Mar; 31(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 26783697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Conventional radiology, digital radiology with photostimulable phosphor, laser digitalization of thoracic radiographic films at the bedside. A comparative study].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Guidarelli G; Sartoni Galloni S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 1455031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Image-intensifier photofluorography and conventional chest radiography: comparison of diagnostic efficacy.
    Manninen H; Partanen K; Soimakallio S; Rytkönen H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Mar; 150(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 3257605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Comparative Study of Patient Identifications for Conventional and Portable Chest Radiographs Utilizing ROC Analysis].
    Kawashima H; Hayashi N; Ohno N; Matsuura Y; Sanada S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Aug; 71(8):663-9. PubMed ID: 26289978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.
    Goodman LR; Foley WD; Wilson CR; Rimm AA; Lawson TL
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3940392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Projection profile analysis for identifying different views of chest radiographs.
    Kao EF; Lee C; Jaw TS; Hsu JS; Liu GC
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):518-25. PubMed ID: 16554233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Development of a digital duplication system for portable chest radiographs.
    Hoffmann KR; Doi K; MacMahon H; Giger ML; Nishikawa RM; Xu XW; Yao L; Kano A; Carlin M
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Aug; 7(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 7948174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Image optimization in a computed-radiography/photostimulable-phosphor system.
    Sherrier RH; Chotas HG; Johnson GA; Chiles C; Ravin CE
    J Digit Imaging; 1989 Nov; 2(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 2488166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs.
    Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Lanhede B; Almén A; Sandborg M; McVey G; Mattsson S; Panzer W; Besjakov J; Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Alm Carlsson G; Dance DR; Tylén U; Zankl M
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 77(915):204-15. PubMed ID: 15020361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Learning to detect chest radiographs containing pulmonary lesions using visual attention networks.
    Pesce E; Joseph Withey S; Ypsilantis PP; Bakewell R; Goh V; Montana G
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Apr; 53():26-38. PubMed ID: 30660946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Computerized methods for determining respiratory phase on dynamic chest radiographs obtained by a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) system.
    Tanaka R; Sanada S; Kobayashi T; Suzuki M; Matsui T; Matsui O
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Mar; 19(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 15827824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Use of incentive spirometry in portable chest radiography.
    McEntee MF; Houssein N; Al-azawi D
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(3):261-9. PubMed ID: 24395892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.