These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9929752)

  • 1. Randomized evaluation of four versus five French catheters for transfemoral coronary angiography.
    Metz D; Chapoutot L; Brasselet C; Jolly D
    Clin Cardiol; 1999 Jan; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 9929752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 4 and 6 French catheters for coronary angiography: real-world modeling.
    Durst R; Lotan C; Nassar H; Gotsman M; Mor E; Varshitzki B; Greganski P; Jabara R; Admon D; Meerkin D; Mosseri M
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2007 Apr; 9(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 17491224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 5-Fr sheathless transradial cardiac catheterization using conventional catheters and balloon assisted tracking; a new approach to downsizing.
    Mamas MA; George S; Ratib K; Kwok CS; Elkhazin A; Sandhu K; Stubbs J; Luxford P; Nolan J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 27707595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomised comparison of the use of 4 and 6 French diagnostic catheters: the limits of downsizing.
    Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Di Blasi A; Predolini S; Laterza C; Quaini E
    Int J Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 79(2-3):113-7; discussion 117-8. PubMed ID: 11461729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring pressure-derived fractional flow reserve through four French diagnostic catheters.
    Legalery P; Seronde MF; Meneveau N; Schiele F; Bassand JP
    Am J Cardiol; 2003 May; 91(9):1075-8. PubMed ID: 12714149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 4Fr in 5Fr sheathless technique with standard catheters for transradial coronary interventions: technical challenges and persisting issues.
    Abdelaal E; Rimac G; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Roy L; Tardif MA; Costerousse O; Pancholy SB; Bertrand OF
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 85(5):809-15. PubMed ID: 25331800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Standard Catheters Versus Radial Artery-Specific Catheter in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Angiography Through Transradial Access.
    Chen O; Goel S; Acholonu M; Kulbak G; Verma S; Travlos E; Casazza R; Borgen E; Malik B; Friedman M; Moskovits N; Frankel R; Shani J; Ayzenberg S
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 118(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 27269989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronary angiography using 4 Fr catheters with acisted power injection: A randomized comparison to 6 Fr manual technique and early ambulation.
    Khoukaz S; Kern MJ; Bitar SR; Azrak E; Eisenhauer M; Wolford T; El-Shafei A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 11246259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Qualitative comparison of coronary angiograms between 4 French catheters with an advanced cardiovascular injection system and 6 French catheters with manual injection.
    Gonzalez MA; Ben-Dor I; Gaglia MA; Torguson R; Shimellis H; Bui A; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Satler LF; Waksman R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 79(5):843-8. PubMed ID: 21805567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronary angiography using 4 or 6 French diagnostic catheters: a prospective, randomized study.
    Lefevre T; Morice MC; Bonan R; Dumas P; Louvard Y; Karrillon G; Loubeyre C; Piechaud JF
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2001 Oct; 13(10):674-7. PubMed ID: 11581508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.
    Brueck M; Bandorski D; Kramer W; Wieczorek M; Höltgen R; Tillmanns H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 19926042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coronary angiography using 4 French catheters with power injection: a randomized comparison with 6 French catheters.
    Arora P; Naik N; Bahl VK; Mishra S; Yadav R; Sharma S; Manchanda SC
    Indian Heart J; 2002; 54(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 12086383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized comparison of coronary angiography using 4F catheters: 4F manual versus "Acisted" power injection technique.
    Chahoud G; Khoukaz S; El-Shafei A; Azrak E; Bitar S; Kern MJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Jun; 53(2):221-4. PubMed ID: 11387608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of catheter size on reliability of quantitative coronary angiographic measurements (comparison of 4Fr and 6Fr catheters).
    Ito S; Kinoshita K; Endo A; Nakamura M; Muramatsu T
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1752-1757. PubMed ID: 26849831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
    Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for both coronary arteries via the right transradial approach. A prospective, randomized trial of Tiger II vs. Judkins catheters.
    Kim SM; Kim DK; Kim DI; Kim DS; Joo SJ; Lee JW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2006; 22(3-4):295-303. PubMed ID: 16328852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radial versus femoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography in stable angina pectoris.
    Ludman PF; Stephens NG; Harcombe A; Lowe MD; Shapiro LM; Schofield PM; Petch MC
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 May; 79(9):1239-41. PubMed ID: 9164893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transradial coronary angiography and intervention.
    Ahmed WH
    Saudi Med J; 2003 Aug; 24(8):850-3. PubMed ID: 12939670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age.
    Achenbach S; Ropers D; Kallert L; Turan N; Krähner R; Wolf T; Garlichs C; Flachskampf F; Daniel WG; Ludwig J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Nov; 72(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 18798237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography using 5 French preformed (Judkins) catheters from the percutaneous right brachial approach: a comparative analysis with the femoral approach.
    Bush CA; VanFossen DB; Kolibash AJ; Magorien RD; Bacon JP; Ansel GM; Eaton GM; Ramancik MJ; Orsini AR; Palmer SL
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Aug; 29(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 8221844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.