These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9930778)

  • 1. Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested".
    Caplan LS; Blackman D; Nadel M; Monticciolo DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 9930778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The American College of Radiology's BI-RADS 3 Classification in a Nationwide Screening Program: current assessment and comparison with earlier use.
    Monticciolo DL; Caplan LS
    Breast J; 2004; 10(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 15009036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions.
    Varas X; Leborgne JH; Leborgne F; Mezzera J; Jaumandreu S; Leborgne F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 12185047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
    Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lesion and patient characteristics associated with malignancy after a probably benign finding on community practice mammography.
    Lehman CD; Rutter CM; Eby PR; White E; Buist DS; Taplin SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):511-5. PubMed ID: 18212240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States).
    Eheman CR; Benard VB; Blackman D; Lawson HW; Anderson C; Helsel W; Lee NC
    Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Feb; 17(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16411050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.
    Baum JK; Hanna LG; Acharyya S; Mahoney MC; Conant EF; Bassett LW; Pisano ED
    Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21502382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
    Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 12644536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of the results after using of the BI-RADS categories in 1,777 clinical mammograms].
    Hauth EA; Khan K; Wolfgarten B; Betzler A; Kimmig R; Forsting M
    Radiologe; 2008 Mar; 48(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 17265008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meeting the mammography screening needs of underserved women: the performance of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in 2002-2003 (United States).
    Tangka FK; Dalaker J; Chattopadhyay SK; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Hall IJ; DeGroff A; Blackman DK; Coates RJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Nov; 17(9):1145-54. PubMed ID: 17006720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms.
    Lehman C; Holt S; Peacock S; White E; Urban N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12076896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database.
    Berg WA; Berg JM; Sickles EA; Burnside ES; Zuley ML; Rosenberg RD; Lee CS
    Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 32427557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of unconventional utilization of BI-RADS category 3 assessment at opportunistic screening.
    Altas H; Tureli D; Cengic I; Kucukkaya F; Aribal E; Kaya H
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1304-1309. PubMed ID: 26019241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of assigning BI-RADS category-3 to breast lesion with respect to follow-up.
    Masroor I
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Apr; 18(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 18474152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance?
    Bowles EJ; Sickles EA; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Elmore JG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):1152-9. PubMed ID: 20308525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surveillance of probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions in mammography: what is the right follow-up protocol?
    Buch KA; Qureshi MM; Carpentier B; Cunningham DA; Stone M; Jaffe C; Quinn M; Gonzalez C; LaVoye J; Hines N; Bloch BN
    Breast J; 2015; 21(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 25669425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
    Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.
    Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.