132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9930850)
1. Italy labors in its reform of the CNR.
Birmingham K; Ballmaier M
Nat Med; 1999 Feb; 5(2):132. PubMed ID: 9930850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review cuts power of Italy's 'barons'.
Abbott A
Nature; 1998 Apr; 392(6676):531. PubMed ID: 9560135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. APS comments on the 21st century bioeconomy.
Physiologist; 2012 Feb; 55(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 22439365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Japanese council urges reform of funding system.
Triendl R
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1176-8. PubMed ID: 12454656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New foundations for young investigators.
Cohen RA
Clin Res; 1991 Oct; 39(3):505-13. PubMed ID: 1934900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Europe. Fix funding agency's 'original sin,' ERC review panel demands.
Enserink M
Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5940):523-4. PubMed ID: 19644079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. One for the money.
Mandavilli A
Nat Med; 2005 Jun; 11(6):587-8. PubMed ID: 15937461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What does a study section look for in evaluating a grant proposal?
Buckley JP
Am J Pharm Educ; 1977 Nov; 41(4):381-2. PubMed ID: 10236661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reply to 'One for the money'.
Snow B
Nat Med; 2005 Aug; 11(8):817. PubMed ID: 16079868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Betting big on an AIDS vaccine.
Nat Med; 2005 Jun; 11(6):579. PubMed ID: 15937450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduced grants set off short fuses among US scientists.
Ready T
Nat Med; 2005 Jun; 11(6):582. PubMed ID: 15937454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Statement Report of the Polish Parasitology Society from September 1998 till September 2001].
Wedrychowicz H; Rocka A
Wiad Parazytol; 2002; 48(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 16883710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What do Public Health Service agencies do with grant proposals?
Willette RE
Am J Pharm Educ; 1977 Nov; 41(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 10313840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Research Priorities Project, year 2000: the Lone Ranger rides again.
Larson E; Olmsted RN
Am J Infect Control; 2001 Apr; 29(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 11287871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The national institute of biomedical imaging and bioengineering and the extramural funding of imaging research.
Wallner PE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):87-8. PubMed ID: 17411531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Loss of grants review board leaves Australian scientists wary.
Dennis C
Nat Med; 2005 Sep; 11(9):910. PubMed ID: 16145558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The challenge of private biomedical research funding in Italy.
Bordignon C
Nat Med; 1999 Feb; 5(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 9930852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. France plans national gene therapy strategy.
Butler D
Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):397. PubMed ID: 7984227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Science and politics: a fatal mix?
Joachim C
Nat Mater; 2004 Jul; 3(7):416. PubMed ID: 15229483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Tool for planning the grant application process.
Crain HC; Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2000; 48(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 11135142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
