These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. A look at Pap test accuracy and the duty to inform from a risk management perspective. Meister S QRC Advis; 1997 Dec; 14(2):1, 5-8. PubMed ID: 10176015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cervical smears unsuitable for exclusion of cervical carcinoma]. Giard RW; Blok P Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):86-7. PubMed ID: 10674109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA '88) on the incidence of invasive cervical cancer. Helfand M; O'Connor GT; Zimmer-Gembeck M; Beck JR Med Care; 1992 Dec; 30(12):1067-82. PubMed ID: 1453813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears. Koss LG; Lin E; Schreiber K; Elgert P; Mango L Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System. Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Challenges in cervical cancer screening: what clinicians, patients and the general public need to know. Grohs DH Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 8604566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. HPV testing in cervical cytology practice: it's all about choice. Stoler MH Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 15839612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for cervical cancer. Eddy DM Ann Intern Med; 1990 Aug; 113(3):214-26. PubMed ID: 2115753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The current status of the Papanicolaou smear. Shingleton HM; Patrick RL; Johnston WW; Smith RA CA Cancer J Clin; 1995; 45(5):305-20. PubMed ID: 7656133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Too early to solve Pap device puzzle. Check W CAP Today; 1997 Jun; 11(6):1, 44-6, 48-9 passim. PubMed ID: 10174227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Papanicolaou cervical smears for screening in asymptomatic women. Barnes BA Prim Care; 1981 Mar; 8(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 6911755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. Experience in Greece. Veneti S; Papaefthimiou M; Symiakaki H; Ioannidou-Mouzaka L Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9987447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review. Mitchell H; Medley G Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening and litigation. Some false negatives arise from negligence. Coleman DV BMJ; 2000 Sep; 321(7263):761. PubMed ID: 10999919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quality of vaginal smear for cervical cancer screening: a concordance study]. Cendales R; Wiesner C; Murillo RH; Piñeros M; Tovar S; Mejía JC Biomedica; 2010; 30(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 20890555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer. Linder J Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]