These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears]. Weintraub D Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Evaluation of PAPNET--a semiautomated system used in the screening against cervical cancer]. Hølund B; Ejersbo D; Hjortebjerg A Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5802-6. PubMed ID: 9782761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cervical screening: what is the point? Koss LG Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory]. Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A Pathologica; 1998 Aug; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Milwaukee deaths reignite critical issues in cervical cancer screening. Voelker R JAMA; 1995 May 24-31; 273(20):1559-60. PubMed ID: 7745755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A perspective on modern quality control methods. Hutchinson ML; Lapidus SN; Inhorn SL; Papillo J Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(4):837-41. PubMed ID: 8693909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The PAPNET system for quality control of cervical smears: validation and limits. Cenci M; Nagar C; Giovagnoli MR; Vecchione A Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(6D):4731-4. PubMed ID: 9494597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An analysis of the variation of human interpretation: Papnet a mini-challenge. Husain OA; Butler EB; Nayagam M; Mango L; Alonzo A Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 Feb; 6(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 8167098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears]. Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Pitfalls in the screening and early diagnosis of cervical cancer. Wain GV; Hacker NF Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 2(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 2102310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy. Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost analysis of PAPNET-assisted vs. conventional Pap smear evaluation in primary screening of cervical smears. Meerding WJ; Doornewaard H; van Ballegooijen M; Bos A; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG; van der Schouw YT; Habbema JD Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11213501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]