These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 993226)

  • 21. Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review.
    Saha S; Pal S
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1984 Apr; 18(4):435-62. PubMed ID: 6376513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanical characteristics of the stem-cement interface.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Wright TM; Ingraffea AR
    J Orthop Res; 1991 Nov; 9(6):798-808. PubMed ID: 1919842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bone-particle-impregnated bone cement: an in vivo weight-bearing study.
    Dai KR; Liu YK; Park JB; Clark CR; Nishiyama K; Zheng ZK
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Feb; 25(2):141-56. PubMed ID: 2055912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fatigue properties and stem subsidence in wire coil reinforced PMMA bone cement: a preliminary in vitro study.
    Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(6):453-62. PubMed ID: 9138655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative fatigue behavior of different bone cements.
    Gates EI; Carter DR; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Oct; (189):294-9. PubMed ID: 6478701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adhesive bone cement both to bone and metals: 4-META in MMA initiated with tri-n-butyl borane.
    Ishihara K; Nakabayashi N
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Dec; 23(12):1475-82. PubMed ID: 2621219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms.
    Topoleski LD; Ducheyne P; Cuckler JM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Feb; 24(2):135-54. PubMed ID: 2329111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modified PMMA cements for a hydrolysis resistant metal-polymer interface in orthopaedic applications.
    Gbureck U; Grübel S; Thull R; Barralet JE
    Acta Biomater; 2005 Nov; 1(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 16701848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fracture toughness and fatigue crack propagation rate of short fiber reinforced epoxy composites for analogue cortical bone.
    Chong AC; Miller F; Buxton M; Friis EA
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Aug; 129(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 17655469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the mechanical properties of Simplex P, Zimmer Regular, and LVC bone cements.
    Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Greer JA; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Jun; 21(6):719-30. PubMed ID: 3597461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical assessment of a new adhesive bone cement for otologic surgery.
    Werning JW; Maniglia AJ; Anderson JM
    Am J Otol; 1995 May; 16(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 8588618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A fatigue damage model for the cement-bone interface.
    Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2004 Oct; 37(10):1505-12. PubMed ID: 15336925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fiber-enriched double-setting calcium phosphate bone cement.
    dos Santos LA; Carrodéguas RG; Boschi AO; Fonseca de Arruda AC
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 May; 65(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 12734819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sustained pressurization of polymethylmethacrylate: a comparison of low- and moderate-viscosity bone cements.
    Bean DJ; Hollis JM; Woo SL; Convery FR
    J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 3379511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fracture toughness of Kevlar 29/poly(methyl methacrylate) composite materials for surgical implantations.
    Pourdeyhimi B; Robinson HH; Schwartz P; Wagner HD
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1986; 14(3):277-94. PubMed ID: 3767094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A new bioactive bone cement consisting of BIS-GMA resin and bioactive glass powder.
    Kawanabe K; Tamura J; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Kokubo T; Yoshihara S
    J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 10148600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bone-methyl methacrylate interfacial shear strength: an experimental study of dogs.
    McCarthy TC; Wells MK; Gorman HA
    Am J Vet Res; 1977 Jan; 38(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 835870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adhesion enhancement of steel fibers to acrylic bone cement through a silane coupling agent.
    Kotha SP; Lieberman M; Vickers A; Schmid SR; Mason JJ
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Jan; 76(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 16224777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Innovations in acrylic bone cement and application equipment.
    Kindt-Larsen T; Smith DB; Jensen JS
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 7703541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.