These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 993233)

  • 1. Osteogenesis in ceramic implantation--a radioisotope study.
    Brady JM; Cutright DE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1976 Nov; 10(6):977-9. PubMed ID: 993233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Filling of bone defects with granular calcium phosphate ceramic. Experimental animal studies with histologic results].
    Jacobs HG; Luhr HG; Krause A; Uberall H
    Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1984; 8(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 6597010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the biocompatibility of ALCAP ceramics in rat femurs.
    Mattie DR; Bajpai PK
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Dec; 22(12):1101-26. PubMed ID: 3235456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics.
    Jarcho M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1981 Jun; (157):259-78. PubMed ID: 7018783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Osteogenesis after bone and bone marrow transplantation. The ability of ceramic materials to sustain osteogenesis from transplanted bone marrow cells: preliminary studies.
    Nade S; Armstrong L; McCartney E; Baggaley B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Dec; (181):255-63. PubMed ID: 6315286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative experimental animal studies on bone regeneration after implantation of various calcium phosphate ceramics].
    Wagner W; Wahlmann UW
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Jun; 40(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 3868572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heterotopic osteogenesis in porous ceramics induced by marrow cells.
    Ohgushi H; Goldberg VM; Caplan AI
    J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(4):568-78. PubMed ID: 2544711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synthos--a bioceramic bone replacement material.
    Ferraro JW; Fetter AW; Mohler LR; McShane M
    Surg Forum; 1977; 28():537. PubMed ID: 617529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Apatite formation on three kinds of bioactive material at an early stage in vivo: a comparative study by transmission electron microscopy.
    Neo M; Nakamura T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Yamamuro T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Aug; 27(8):999-1006. PubMed ID: 8408128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in ceramic-bone interface between surface-active ceramics and resorbable ceramics: a study by scanning and transmission electron microscopy.
    Neo M; Kotani S; Fujita Y; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Bando Y; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Feb; 26(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 1569117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interface of calcium-phosphate and glass-ceramic in bone, a structural analysis.
    Gross UM; Müller-Mai CM; Voigt C
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jul; 11():83-5. PubMed ID: 2397266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A ferric calcium phosphorous oxide (FECAP) ceramic for rebuilding bone.
    Larrabee RA; Fuski MP; Bajpai PK
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1993; 29():59-64. PubMed ID: 8329636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo osteogenesis assay: a rapid method for quantitative analysis.
    Dennis JE; Konstantakos EK; Arm D; Caplan AI
    Biomaterials; 1998 Aug; 19(15):1323-8. PubMed ID: 9758032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Endosseous implantation of hydroxylapatite ceramics and tricalcium phosphate ceramic: integration versus substitution].
    Osborn JF; Donath K
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1984 Dec; 39(12):970-6. PubMed ID: 6599400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tricalcium phosphate ceramic--a resorbable bone implant: review and current status.
    Metsger DS; Driskell TD; Paulsrud JR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1982 Dec; 105(6):1035-8. PubMed ID: 6818267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone-bonding behavior under load-bearing conditions of an alumina ceramic implant incorporating beads coated with glass-ceramic containing apatite and wollastonite.
    Li ZL; Kitsugi T; Yamamuro T; Chang YS; Senaha Y; Takagi H; Nakamura T; Oka M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Sep; 29(9):1081-8. PubMed ID: 8567706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New bone formation in the in vivo implantation of bioceramics. A quantitative analysis.
    Wu H; Zhu TB; Du JY; Hong GX; Sun SZ; Xu XH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1992 Sep; 105(9):753-7. PubMed ID: 1288979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Osteogenic activity of bone morphogenetic protein and hydroxyapatite composite implants.
    Herr G; Wahl D; Küsswetter W
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1993; 207():99-107. PubMed ID: 8154844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Percutaneous transplantation of pulverized bone in rabbits.
    Mizohata S; Kita H; Tanaka S
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 May; 60(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 3528351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Piezoelectric ceramic implants: in vivo results.
    Park JB; Kelly BJ; Kenner GH; von Recum AF; Grether MF; Coffeen WW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Jan; 15(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 7348700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.