173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9932561)
1. Computed tomography comparison of bony pelvis dimensions between women with and without genital prolapse.
Sze EH; Kohli N; Miklos JR; Roat T; Karram MM
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 93(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 9932561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Architectural differences in the bony pelvis of women with and without pelvic floor disorders.
Handa VL; Pannu HK; Siddique S; Gutman R; VanRooyen J; Cundiff G
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 102(6):1283-90. PubMed ID: 14662216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Normal pelvic dimensions of Nigerian women in Ile Ife by computed tomographic pelvimetry.
Ma'aji SM; Adetiloye VA; Ayoola OO
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2007 Jun; 14(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 17599106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of correlation between bony pelvis dimensions and pelvic organ prolapse in different compartments.
Yang Z; Xia Z; Li B; Yao X; Jin X; Wang X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Sep; 252():213-217. PubMed ID: 32622105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Do the obstetrically relevant bony pelvic measurements change? A retrospective analysis of computed tomographic pelvic x-rays].
Lehmann KJ; Wischnik A; Zahn K; Georgi M
Rofo; 1992 May; 156(5):425-8. PubMed ID: 1596543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bony dimensions at the level of the pelvic floor in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.
Stein TA; Kaur G; Summers A; Larson KA; DeLancey JO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):241.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19254580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR obstetric pelvimetry: effect of birthing position on pelvic bony dimensions.
Michel SC; Rake A; Treiber K; Seifert B; Chaoui R; Huch R; Marincek B; Kubik-Huch RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 12239066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement error in computed tomography pelvimetry.
Anderson N; Humphries N; Wells JE
Australas Radiol; 2005 Apr; 49(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 15845044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of normal pelvis morphometry of modern Chinese southern Han female and its correlation with age].
Liu P; Yu YH; Chen CL; Tang YX; Wang L; Mao DR; Xu YK; Chen L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 48(7):481-5. PubMed ID: 24284215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are bony pelvis dimensions associated with levator ani defects? A case-control study.
Berger MB; Doumouchtsis SK; Delancey JO
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1377-83. PubMed ID: 23306771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance assessment of pelvic anatomy and pelvic floor disorders after childbirth.
Handa VL; Lockhart ME; Kenton KS; Bradley CS; Fielding JR; Cundiff GW; Salomon CG; Hakim C; Ye W; Richter HE
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Feb; 20(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 18846311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between levator ani and bony pelvis morphology and clinical grade of prolapse in women.
Li R; Song Y; Ma M
Clin Anat; 2015 Sep; 28(6):813-9. PubMed ID: 25864568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vaginal thickness, cross-sectional area, and perimeter in women with and those without prolapse.
Hsu Y; Chen L; Delancey JO; Ashton-Miller JA
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1012-7. PubMed ID: 15863538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lumbosacral spine and pelvic inlet changes associated with pelvic organ prolapse.
Nguyen JK; Lind LR; Choe JY; McKindsey F; Sinow R; Bhatia NN
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Mar; 95(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 10711538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pelvimetry by Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Non-Pregnant Multiparous Women Who Delivered Vaginally.
Salk I; Cetin A; Salk S; Cetin M
Pol J Radiol; 2016; 81():219-27. PubMed ID: 27231494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pelvimetry by digital radiography.
Adam P; Alberge Y; Castellano S; Kassab M; Escude B
Clin Radiol; 1985 May; 36(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 4064519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The importance of x-ray pelvimetry for the prognosis of pelvic dystocia].
Iarŭkov A; Cherveniashki S; Chernev T
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1990; 29(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 2400056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective cohort study of pelvic support changes among nulliparous, multiparous, and pre- and post-menopausal women.
Sze EH; Hobbs G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Feb; 160(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 22154667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Obstetric pelvimetry by three-dimensional computed tomography in non-pregnant Japanese women: a retrospective single-center study.
Nishikawa S; Miki M; Chigusa Y; Furuta M; Kido A; Kawamura Y; Ueda Y; Mandai M; Mogami H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(1):2190444. PubMed ID: 36927362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Low dose helical CT pelvimetry: evaluation of radiation dose and image processing].
Garnier S; Bertrand P; Chapiron C; Asquier E; Rouleau P; Brunereau L
J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 85(6 Pt 1):747-53. PubMed ID: 15243375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
