These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9932892)
1. Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine. Pospiech J; Stolke D; Wilke HJ; Claes LE Neurosurgery; 1999 Feb; 44(2):379-84; discussion 384-5. PubMed ID: 9932892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Eck JC; Humphreys SC; Lim TH; Jeong ST; Kim JG; Hodges SD; An HS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2431-4. PubMed ID: 12435970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Intradiscal pressure forces on cervical intervertebral discs in physiologic and pathologic conditions. In vitro study]. Pospiech J; Wilke HJ; Claes LE; Stolke D Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1996; 381(6):303-8. PubMed ID: 9082102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relevance of using a compressive preload in the cervical spine: an experimental and numerical simulating investigation. Barrey C; Rousseau MA; Persohn S; Campana S; Perrin G; Skalli W Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():S155-65. PubMed ID: 25845316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics. Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical facet force analysis after disc replacement versus fusion. Patel VV; Wuthrich ZR; McGilvray KC; Lafleur MC; Lindley EM; Sun D; Puttlitz CM Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 May; 44():52-58. PubMed ID: 28340364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effects of novel angled cervical disc replacement on facet joint stress]. Bai C; Zhang W; Ling W; Tian Z; Dang X; Wang K Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22568314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion. Balaram AK; Ghanayem AJ; OʼLeary PT; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):E763-9. PubMed ID: 24732831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery. Park J; Shin JJ; Lim J World Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 82(6):1388-93. PubMed ID: 24937596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does anterior plating of the cervical spine predispose to adjacent segment changes? Rao RD; Wang M; McGrady LM; Perlewitz TJ; David KS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(24):2788-92; discussion 2793. PubMed ID: 16371904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17633485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro flexibility of the cervical spine after ventral uncoforaminotomy. Laboratory investigation. Schmieder K; Kettner A; Brenke C; Harders A; Pechlivanis I; Wilke HJ J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Nov; 7(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 17977196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis. Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level. Park DH; Ramakrishnan P; Cho TH; Lorenz E; Eck JC; Humphreys SC; Lim TH J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Sep; 7(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 17877270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center. Barrey C; Mosnier T; Jund J; Perrin G; Skalli W J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Nov; 11(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19929355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posterior facet load changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study. Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 22652989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine. Healy AT; Sundar SJ; Cardenas RJ; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Francis TB J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]