These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9932892)

  • 41. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Load-displacement properties of the normal and injured lower cervical spine in vitro.
    Richter M; Wilke HJ; Kluger P; Claes L; Puhl W
    Eur Spine J; 2000 Apr; 9(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 10823425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of cervical spine position, turning time, and cervical segment on cadaver intradiscal pressure during cervical spinal manipulative therapy.
    Wu LP; Huang YQ; Zhou WH; Manas D; Zhao WD; Chen JZ; Yin QS; Wang LH
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Jul; 35(6):428-36. PubMed ID: 22921320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
    Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
    J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis.
    Fuller DA; Kirkpatrick JS; Emery SE; Wilber RG; Davy DT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Aug; 23(15):1649-56. PubMed ID: 9704371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Neural space integrity of the lower cervical spine: effect of normal range of motion.
    Nuckley DJ; Konodi MA; Raynak GC; Ching RP; Mirza SK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Mar; 27(6):587-95. PubMed ID: 11884906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The facet joint loading profile of a cervical intervertebral disc replacement incorporating a novel saddle-shaped articulation.
    Stieber JR; Quirno M; Kang M; Valdevit A; Errico TJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Oct; 24(7):432-6. PubMed ID: 21336178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement.
    Welke B; Schwarze M; Hurschler C; Book T; Magdu S; Daentzer D
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2247-54. PubMed ID: 26684468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of varying muscle forces on lumbar intradiscal pressure: an in vitro study.
    Wilke HJ; Wolf S; Claes LE; Arand M; Wiesend A
    J Biomech; 1996 Apr; 29(4):549-55. PubMed ID: 8964785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dynamic foraminal dimensions during neck extension and rotation in fusion and artificial disc replacement: an observational study.
    Yeni YN; Baumer T; Oravec D; Basheer A; McDonald CP; Bey MJ; Bartol SW; Chang V
    Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 28882520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Finite element analysis of the cervical spine: a material property sensitivity study.
    Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Jan; 14(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 10619089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional motion pattern of the canine cervical spine segment C4-C5.
    Hofstetter M; Gédet P; Doherr M; Ferguson SJ; Forterre F
    Vet Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 19152617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Contact pressure in the facet joint during sagittal bending of the cadaveric cervical spine.
    Jaumard NV; Bauman JA; Weisshaar CL; Guarino BB; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jul; 133(7):071004. PubMed ID: 21823743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Prediction of Cervical Spinal Joint Loading and Secondary Motion Using a Musculoskeletal Multibody Dynamics Model Via Force-Dependent Kinematics Approach.
    Diao H; Xin H; Dong J; He X; Li D; Jin Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1403-E1409. PubMed ID: 28368985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
    Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Finite Element Analysis of Biomechanics of Cervical Spine after Dynamic Cervical Implant Surgery].
    Wang C; Zhao G; Bai L; Chen N; Song Y; Chen E; Zhao Q
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 33(4):645-51. PubMed ID: 29714901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In vitro-analysis of kinematics and intradiscal pressures in cervical arthroplasty versus fusion--A biomechanical study in a sheep model with two semi-constrained prosthesis.
    Daentzer D; Welke B; Hurschler C; Husmann N; Jansen C; Flamme CH; Richter BI
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Mar; 14():27. PubMed ID: 25889378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 patients: clinical article.
    McDonald CP; Chang V; McDonald M; Ramo N; Bey MJ; Bartol S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Mar; 20(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 24359000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases.
    Mo Z; Li Q; Jia Z; Yang J; Wong DW; Fan Y
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 27652678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.