These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9934000)
1. A workplace breast cancer screening program. Costs and components. Schrammel P; Griffiths RI; Griffiths CB AAOHN J; 1998 Nov; 46(11):523-9. PubMed ID: 9934000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer screening in the workplace. Employer costs. Snyder C; Schrammel PN; Griffiths CB; Griffiths RI AAOHN J; 1998 Aug; 46(8):379-84. PubMed ID: 9748918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost analysis of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: selected states, 2003 to 2004. Ekwueme DU; Gardner JG; Subramanian S; Tangka FK; Bapat B; Richardson LC Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(3):626-35. PubMed ID: 18157831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pattern of use and health care system costs. Olivotto IA; Kan L; Mates D; King S CMAJ; 1999 Feb; 160(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 10065075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Worksite breast cancer screening programs: a review. Caplan LS; Coughlin SS AAOHN J; 1998 Sep; 46(9):443-51; quiz 452-3. PubMed ID: 9923205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The costs of mammography screening in New Zealand: evidence from the pilot programmes. Menon A; Devlin NJ; Richardson AK N Z Med J; 1994 Dec; 107(991):501-3. PubMed ID: 7830979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An academic health center cost analysis of screening mammography: creating a financially viable service. Chen SL; Clark S; Pierce LJ; Hayes DF; Helvie MA; Greeno PL; Newman LA; Chang AE Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 15329914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic savings and costs of periodic mammographic screening in the workplace. Griffiths RI; McGrath MM; Vogel VG Oncology (Williston Park); 1996 Mar; 10(3):285-9; discussion: 289-94. PubMed ID: 8820444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing and testing a cost-assessment tool for cancer screening programs. Subramanian S; Ekwueme DU; Gardner JG; Trogdon J Am J Prev Med; 2009 Sep; 37(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 19666160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India. Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection? Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of breast cancer screening. Pisano ED; McLelland R Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):579-87. PubMed ID: 1909543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?]. Bick U Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness and benefit-cost of peer-based workplace substance abuse prevention coupled with random testing. Miller TR; Zaloshnja E; Spicer RS Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):565-73. PubMed ID: 17125723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analyzing costs and benefits of mammography screening in the workplace. Eley JW AAOHN J; 1989 May; 37(5):171-7. PubMed ID: 2496692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing effect of mammography screening in a university workplace. Champion VL; Skinner CS; Miller AM; Goulet RJ; Wagler K Cancer Detect Prev; 1997; 21(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 9167040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Family physicians' initiative to increase compliance with screening mammography--an innovative community project. Eilat-Tsanani S; Sorek M; Gay N; Chaimovitch O; Kulton L; Tabenkin H Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Dec; 3(12):920-4. PubMed ID: 11794915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Economic evaluation of the new national breast cancer screening programme in France: application to the Bouche-du-Rhone district]. Giorgi R; Reynaud J; Wait S; Seradour B Bull Cancer; 2005 Nov; 92(11):995-1001. PubMed ID: 16316834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of a worksite migraine intervention program on work productivity, productivity costs, and non-workplace impairment among Spanish postal service employees from an employer perspective. Vicente-Herrero T; Burke TA; LaĆnez MJ Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Nov; 20(11):1805-14. PubMed ID: 15537481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]