These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9934001)

  • 1. Repositioning a slumped person in a wheelchair. A biomechanical analysis of three transfer techniques.
    Varcin-Coad L; Barrett R
    AAOHN J; 1998 Nov; 46(11):530-6. PubMed ID: 9934001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of patient transferring tasks: bed to wheelchair and wheelchair to bed.
    Garg A; Owen B; Beller D; Banaag J
    Ergonomics; 1991 Mar; 34(3):289-312. PubMed ID: 1829037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three single-person manual patient techniques for bed-to-wheelchair transfers.
    Hess JA; Kincl LD; Mandeville DS
    Home Healthc Nurse; 2007 Oct; 25(9):577-9. PubMed ID: 18049253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of patient transferring tasks: wheelchair to shower chair and shower chair to wheelchair.
    Garg A; Owen B; Beller D; Banaag J
    Ergonomics; 1991 Apr; 34(4):407-19. PubMed ID: 1860461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transfer of the horizontal patient: the effect of a friction reducing assistive device on low back mechanics.
    McGill SM; Kavcic NS
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):915-29. PubMed ID: 16147412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk factors for lower back injury in male dancers performing ballet lifts.
    Alderson J; Hopper L; Elliott B; Ackland T
    J Dance Med Sci; 2009; 13(3):83-9. PubMed ID: 19754984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
    Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An ergonomic comparison between mechanical and manual patient transfer techniques.
    Silvia CE; Bloswick DS; Lillquist D; Wallace D; Perkins MS
    Work; 2002; 19(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 12454348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comprehensive analysis of low-back disorder risk and spinal loading during the transferring and repositioning of patients using different techniques.
    Marras WS; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Bertsche PK
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):904-26. PubMed ID: 10424181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A biomechanical analysis of methods used for transferring totally dependent patients.
    Ulin SS; Chaffin DB; Patellos CL; Blitz SG; Emerick CA; Lundy F; Misher L
    SCI Nurs; 1997 Mar; 14(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9165952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of cumulative low back loads of caregivers when transferring patients using overhead and floor mechanical lifting devices.
    Santaguida PL; Pierrynowski M; Goldsmith C; Fernie G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Nov; 20(9):906-16. PubMed ID: 16054280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using sitting as a component of job rotation strategies: are lifting/lowering kinetics and kinematics altered following prolonged sitting.
    Howarth SJ; Beach TA; Pearson AJ; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 19081557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting.
    Shin G; Mirka G
    Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 15204292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Load spatial pathway and spine loading: how does lift origin and destination influence low back response?
    Davis K; Marras W
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):1031-46. PubMed ID: 16147419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 20850750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Manual handling practices and injuries among ICU nurses.
    Retsas A; Pinikahana J
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 1999; 17(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 10776092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical analysis of the effect of changing patient-handling technique.
    Schibye B; Hansen AF; Hye-Knudsen CT; Essendrop M; Böcher M; Skotte J
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Mar; 34(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 12628568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Friction-reducing devices for lateral patient transfers: a biomechanical evaluation.
    Lloyd JD; Baptiste A
    AAOHN J; 2006 Mar; 54(3):113-9. PubMed ID: 16562622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.