144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9934610)
1. The impact of vessel and catheter position on the measurement accuracy in catheter-based quantitative coronary angiography.
Wunderlich W; Roehrig B; Fischer F; Arntz HR; Agrawal R; Morguet A; Schultheiss HP; Horstkotte D
Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Aug; 14(4):217-27. PubMed ID: 9934610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative coronary arteriography: efficient correction of catheter calibrated vessel measurement.
Fischer F; Wunderlich W; Noring J; Linderer T
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():724. PubMed ID: 8591310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Size estimation and magnification error in radiographic imaging: implications for classification of arteriovenous malformations.
Elisevich K; Cunningham IA; Assis L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1995 Mar; 16(3):531-8. PubMed ID: 7793378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suitability of the Cordis Stabilizer marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Koning G; Hekking E; Kemppainen JS; Richardson GA; Rothman MT; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 11246248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pitfalls in the determination of absolute dimensions using angiographic catheters as calibration devices in quantitative angiography.
Fortin DF; Spero LA; Cusma JT; Santoro L; Burgess R; Bashore TM
Am J Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 68(11):1176-82. PubMed ID: 1951077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of catheters and metallic catheter markers as calibration standard for measurement of coronary dimension.
Leung WH; Demopulos PA; Alderman EL; Sanders W; Stadius ML
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Nov; 21(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 2225049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration-free device sizing using an inverse geometry x-ray system.
Tomkowiak MT; Speidel MA; Raval AN; Van Lysel MS
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):283-93. PubMed ID: 21361197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients.
Messenger JC; Chen SY; Carroll JD; Burchenal JE; Kioussopoulos K; Groves BM
Int J Card Imaging; 2000 Dec; 16(6):413-27. PubMed ID: 11482706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Development and validation of a graphic method for spatial interpretation and evaluation of biplanar coronary angiograms].
Wunderlich W; Fischer F; Arntz HR; Schultheiss HP; Morguet AJ
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1999 Sep; 44(9):226-31. PubMed ID: 10520529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effect of angiographic projection of blood vessel and calibration catheter on accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography].
Röhrig B; Wunderlich W; Fischer F; Nöring J; Linderer T; Horstkotte D; Schultheiss HP
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():424-5. PubMed ID: 9517220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative coronary arteriography using 6 and 8 French catheters with cine angiographic acquisition.
Ellis SG; Pinto IM; McGillem MJ; DeBoe SF; LeFree MT; Mancini GB
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Jan; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 1995176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calibration with currently available low-radiopacity catheters for scaling in digital quantitative coronary angiography.
Tadehara F; Imazu M; Kono S; Sano K
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):705-12. PubMed ID: 11753141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved determination of biplane imaging geometry from two projection images and its application to three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arterial trees.
Chen SY; Metz CE
Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):633-54. PubMed ID: 9167155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Maeng M; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
Keane D; Haase J; Slager CJ; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Lehmann KG; Ozaki Y; di Mario C; Kirkeeide R; Serruys PW
Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiolgoy International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase II: the effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography. Joint Photographic Experts Group.
Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Hekking E; Zwinderman AH; Becker T; Simon R; Reiber JH
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 35(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 10758988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a new UNIX-based quantitative coronary angiographic system for the measurement of coronary artery lesions.
Bell MR; Britson PJ; Chu A; Holmes DR; Bresnahan JF; Schwartz RS
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Jan; 40(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 8993818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a new automatic system for biplane quantitative coronary arteriography.
Büchi M; Hess OM; Kirkeeide RL; Suter T; Muser M; Osenberg HP; Niederer P; Anliker M; Gould KL; Krayenbühl HP
Int J Card Imaging; 1990; 5(2-3):93-103. PubMed ID: 2230301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization.
Chen SJ; Carroll JD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Apr; 19(4):318-36. PubMed ID: 10909927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of three-dimensional angiographic data obtained by self-calibration of multiview imaging.
Noël PB; Hoffmann KR; Kasodekar S; Walczak AM; Schafer S
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3901-11. PubMed ID: 17089852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
