159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9934610)
21. 3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization.
Chen SJ; Carroll JD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Apr; 19(4):318-36. PubMed ID: 10909927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optimization of three-dimensional angiographic data obtained by self-calibration of multiview imaging.
Noël PB; Hoffmann KR; Kasodekar S; Walczak AM; Schafer S
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3901-11. PubMed ID: 17089852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Vessel centerline reconstruction from non-isocentric and non-orthogonal paired monoplane angiographic images.
Kunio M; O'Brien CC; Lopes AC; Bailey L; Lemos PA; Tearney GJ; Edelman ER
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 34(5):673-682. PubMed ID: 29139034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of a metal ring-marked catheter for geometric calibration in quantitative coronary angiography.
Jacobs JH; Bove AA; Smith HC; Chesebro JH
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 15(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 3180205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vivo assessment of a digital angiographic method to measure absolute coronary artery diameters.
Popma JJ; Eichhorn EJ; Dehmer GJ
Am J Cardiol; 1989 Jul; 64(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 2741822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of quantification of coronary arteriograms with hand-held calipers. A validation study.
Atar D; Saunamäki K
Cardiology; 1994; 85(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 7954569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Coronary artery lumen volume measurement using three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound: validation of a new technique.
Matar FA; Mintz GS; Douek P; Farb A; Virmani R; Javier SP; Popma JJ; Pichard AD; Kent KM; Satler LF
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Nov; 33(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 7874714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of vessel orientation on videodensitometry quantitative coronary arteriography.
Molloi S; Dang Q; Breault J
Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2862-8. PubMed ID: 14655932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Calibration-Free Coronary Artery Measurements for Interventional Device Sizing using Inverse Geometry X-ray Fluoroscopy:
Tomkowiak MT; Raval AN; Van Lysel MS; Funk T; Speidel MA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2014 Mar; 9033():90332H. PubMed ID: 24999298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The impact of vessel orientation in space on densitometric measurements of cross sectional areas of coronary arteries.
Doriot PA; Dorsaz PA; Dorsaz L; Chatelain P; Rutishauser W
Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Dec; 12(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 8993991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative angiographic assessment of coronary stenoses: problems and pitfalls.
Gottwik MG; Siebes M; Bahawar H; Müller A; Wand T; Schlepper M
Z Kardiol; 1983; 72 Suppl 3():111-5. PubMed ID: 6666212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Quantitative determination of left ventricular myocardial perfusion with electron beam computerized tomography].
Rienmüller R; Baumgartner C; Kern R; Harb S; Aigner R; Fueger G; Weihs W
Herz; 1997 Apr; 22(2):63-71. PubMed ID: 9206706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiological quality of coronary guiding catheters: a quantitative analysis.
Herrman JR; Keane D; Ozaki Y; den Boer A; Serruys PW
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Sep; 33(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 8001104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-dimensional densitometric reconstruction and visualization of stenosed coronary artery segments.
van den Broek JG; Slump CH; Storm CJ; van Benthem AC; Buis B
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1995; 19(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 7780946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Morphometry versus densitometry--a comparison by use of casts of human coronary arteries.
Doriot PA; Suilen C; Guggenheim N; Dorsaz PA; Chappuis F; Rutishauser W
Int J Card Imaging; 1992; 8(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 1629638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography with intracoronary ultrasound. Can quantitative coronary angiography accurately estimate the severity of a luminal stenosis?
Bourantas CV; Tweddel AC; Papafaklis MI; Karvelis PS; Fotiadis DI; Katsouras CS; Michalis LK
Angiology; 2009; 60(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 18508852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A microcomputer based automated, quantitative coronary angiographic analysis system.
Santamore WP; Kahl FR; Kutcher MA; Negin M; Whiteman JL; Kase JP; Little WC
Ann Biomed Eng; 1988; 16(4):367-77. PubMed ID: 3177983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase II. The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography.
Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Hekking E; Zwinderman AH; Becker T; Simon R; Reiber JH
Eur Heart J; 2000 Apr; 21(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 10731406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of QCA systems.
Dietz U; Rupprecht HJ; Brennecke R; Fritsch HP; Woltmann J; Blankenberg S; Meyer J
Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Aug; 13(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 9306141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A deterministic approach to automated stenosis quantification.
Tommasini G; Rubartelli P; Piaggio M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Dec; 48(4):435-45. PubMed ID: 10559828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
