137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9934744)
1. In vitro evaluation of integrity and sterilization of single-use argon beam plasma coagulation probes.
Roach SK; Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Sumida SE
Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Jan; 94(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 9934744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro study and in vivo application of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Brandabur JJ; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ; Gluck MG; Sumida SE; Roach SK; Drajpuch DE; Irizarry DL
Endoscopy; 2001 May; 33(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 11396756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical and economic feasibility of reusing disposable perfusion cannulae.
Bloom DF; Cornhill JF; Malchesky PS; Richardson DM; Bolsen KA; Haire DM; Loop FD; Cosgrove DM
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(3):248-9. PubMed ID: 9181243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
Lee RM; Vida F; Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Ball TJ; Patterson DJ; Brandabur JJ; Gluck M; Tomas A; Sumida SE; Irizarry D; Jane C
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Apr; 49(4 Pt 1):477-82. PubMed ID: 10202062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of wire integrity and ability to reprocess single-use sphincterotomes.
Kozarek RA; Sumida SE; Raltz SL; Merriam LD; Irizarry DC
Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 Feb; 45(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 9040994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical and economic feasibility of reusing disposable perfusion cannulas.
Bloom DF; Cornhill JF; Malchesky PS; Richardson DM; Bolsen KA; Haire DM; Loop FD; Cosgrove DM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1997 Sep; 114(3):448-60. PubMed ID: 9305199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of cleaning, function, adequacy of tissue specimen, and durability.
Kozarek RA; Attia FM; Sumida SE; Raltz SL; Roach SK; Schembre DB; Brandabur JJ; Ball TJ; Gluck M; Jiranek GC; Patterson DJ; Bredfeldt JE; Gelfand M; McCormick SE; Drajpuch DB; Moran DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jun; 53(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 11375582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The safety of reused endotracheal tubes sterilized according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.
Yoon SZ; Jeon YS; Kim YC; Lim YJ; Ha JW; Bahk JH; Do SH; Lee KH; Kim CS
J Clin Anesth; 2007 Aug; 19(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 17869987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes.
Nanta P; Senarat W; Tribuddharat C; Danchaivijitr S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of infection by reprocessed and resterilized virus-contaminated catheters; an in-vitro study.
Luijt DS; Schirm J; Savelkoul PH; Hoekstra A
Eur Heart J; 2001 Mar; 22(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 11207079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cleaning methods for ultrasound probes.
Mirza WA; Imam SH; Kharal MS; Aslam M; Ali SA; Masroor I; Ahmad MN
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 May; 18(5):286-9. PubMed ID: 18541083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inadequacy of manual cleaning for reprocessing single-use, triple-lumen sphinctertomes: simulated-use testing comparing manual with automated cleaning methods.
Alfa MJ; Nemes R
Am J Infect Control; 2003 Jun; 31(4):193-207. PubMed ID: 12806356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Specific hygiene issues relating to reprocessing and reuse of single-use devices for laparoscopic surgery.
Roth K; Heeg P; Reichl R
Surg Endosc; 2002 Jul; 16(7):1091-7. PubMed ID: 12165829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dialyzer reprocessing with peroxyacetic acid as sole cleansing and sterilizing agent.
Kes P; Reiner Z; Ratković-Gusić I
Acta Med Croatica; 1997; 51(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9204593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decontaminated single-use devices: an oxymoron that may be placing patients at risk for cross-contamination.
Heeg P; Roth K; Reichl R; Cogdill CP; Bond WW
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):542-9. PubMed ID: 11732782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits.
McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D
Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1073-80. PubMed ID: 22492185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reuse of disposables: let's not embrace waste.
Turi ZG
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jun; 38(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 8776513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. GI endoscopic reprocessing practices in the United States.
Cheung RJ; Ortiz D; DiMarino AJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Sep; 50(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 10462657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resterilization of instruments used in a hospital-based oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic.
Hogg NJ; Morrison AD
J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 71(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 15763036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
