These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9949395)

  • 1. Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 1999 Jan; 26(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9949395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 11991117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image quality evaluation of a desktop computed radiography system.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 11190949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems.
    Flynn MJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1612-23. PubMed ID: 10501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology.
    Monnin P; Holzer Z; Wolf R; Neitzel U; Vock P; Gudinchet F; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 16532949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different computed radiography systems: physical characterization and contrast detail analysis.
    Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Burani A; Acchiappati D
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):440-8. PubMed ID: 20229852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of the two-dimensional detective quantum efficiency of a computed radiography system.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Månsson LG
    Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3172-82. PubMed ID: 14713084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
    Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation of a computed radiography imaging device using a typical "front side" and novel "dual side" readout storage phosphors.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 16532933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
    El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved computed radiography image quality from a BaFl:Eu photostimulable phosphor plate.
    Nakano Y; Gido T; Honda S; Maezawa A; Wakamatsu H; Yanagita T
    Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):592-7. PubMed ID: 11991131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ; Reimann DA
    Med Phys; 1998 Jan; 25(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 9472832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of cassette type on the DQE of CR systems.
    Monnin P; Holzer Z; Wolf R; Neitzel U; Vock P; Gudinchet F; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3637-9. PubMed ID: 17089829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
    Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.