BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9951264)

  • 21. Confronting futile care: overcoming the barriers.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1992 Apr; 56(4):221. PubMed ID: 1606825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Promoting advance directives. The administrators' role in encouraging advance directives.
    Hofmann PB; Jennings B
    Healthc Exec; 2005; 20(5):28, 30. PubMed ID: 16220818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Physicians' responsibilities under Hawaii's new uniform health care decision law.
    Hawaii Med J; 1999 Oct; 58(10):266-8. PubMed ID: 10608090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The patient rights advocate: redefining the doctor-patient relationship in the hospital context.
    Annas GJ; Healey JM
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 27(2):243-69. PubMed ID: 11662092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preservation of life or property?
    Welsh F
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(6):2. PubMed ID: 8609011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dissatisfaction with "do not attaempt resuscitation" orders, a nationwide study of Irish consultant physician practices.
    Michael N
    Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):377. PubMed ID: 17436460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Advance Directives: theoretical concept and practical significance in the USA].
    Vollmann J; Pfaff M
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Jul; 128(27):1494-7. PubMed ID: 12840774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surrogate decision making. Only one piece of the puzzle.
    Morris BA
    Arch Fam Med; 1995 Jun; 4(6):503-4. PubMed ID: 7773424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. End-of-life decision making: what we don't know, we make up; what we do know, we ignore.
    Johnson SH
    Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(1):13-47. PubMed ID: 12199229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. People with developmental disabilities focusing on their own health care.
    St Clair B
    Bioethics Forum; 1996; 12(3):27-30. PubMed ID: 11660306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. When competent patients make irrational choices.
    Brock DW; Wartman SA
    N Engl J Med; 1990 May; 322(22):1595-9. PubMed ID: 2336090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree.
    Terry PB; Vettese M; Song J; Forman J; Haller KB; Miller DJ; Stallings R; Sulmasy DP
    J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 10791278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors influencing rural Wisconsin elders in completing advance directives.
    Marchand L; Cloutier VM; Gjerde C; Haq C
    WMJ; 2001; 100(9):26-31. PubMed ID: 11868517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Advance patient directives: preserving consumer choice.
    Renick O; Hanson S; Nelson M
    Med Interface; 1994 Apr; 7(4):84-7 contd. PubMed ID: 10133362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Promoting advance directives among elderly primary care patients.
    Wissow LS; Belote A; Kramer W; Compton-Phillips A; Kritzler R; Weiner JP
    J Gen Intern Med; 2004 Sep; 19(9):944-51. PubMed ID: 15333059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Medical necessity: who cares, who decides?
    Smoak RD
    Healthplan; 1999; 40(4):19-20, 22. PubMed ID: 10557733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ask Early and Often: Offering Better Palliative Care.
    Azvolinsky A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Jan; 108(1):. PubMed ID: 26711665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. End-of-life decision making, therapeutic jurisprudence, and preventive law: hierarchical v. consensus-based decision-making model.
    Hafemeister TL
    Ariz Law Rev; 1999; 41(2):329-73. PubMed ID: 12666690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ulysses in Minnesota: first steps toward a self-binding psychiatric advance directive statute.
    Cuca R
    Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Sep; 78(6):1152-86. PubMed ID: 10129666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Eliciting patient preferences in today's health care system.
    Cerminara KL
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):688-702. PubMed ID: 12803223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.