62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9951600)
1. Use of the Thin Prep Pap Test in clinical practice.
Guidos BJ; Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Feb; 20(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 9951600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of a liquid-based thin layer method for cervical cancer screening in a population with a low incidence of cervical cancer.
Weintraub J; Morabia A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jan; 22(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10613975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thin-layer Pap test vs. conventional Pap smear. Analysis of 400 split samples.
Biscotti CV; O'Brien DL; Gero MA; Gramlich TL; Kennedy AW; Easley KA
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11838315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
Carpenter AB; Davey DD
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct-to-vial experience with AutoCyte PREP in a small New England regional cytology practice.
Marino JF; Fremont-Smith M
J Reprod Med; 2001 Apr; 46(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 11354836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP. Direct-to-vial performance.
Tench W
J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):912-6. PubMed ID: 11127103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct-to-vial comparison of a new liquid-based cytology system, liqui-PREP versus the conventional pap smear.
Park J; Jung EH; Kim C; Choi YH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Aug; 35(8):488-92. PubMed ID: 17636495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of a liquid-based, thin-layer Pap test in a community hospital. Impact on cytology performance and productivity.
Sass MA
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 14969176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of a fluid-based, thin-layer papanicolaou smear method in the clinical setting of an independent laboratory and an outpatient screening population in New England.
Díaz-Rosario LA; Kabawat SE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Sep; 123(9):817-21. PubMed ID: 10458830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experience with a thin-layer, liquid-based cervical cytologic screening method.
Malle D; Pateinakis P; Chakka E; Destouni C
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 12685177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicenter direct to vial evaluation of a liquid-based pap test.
Hatch KD; Sheets E; Kennedy A; Ferris DG; Darragh T; Twiggs L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2004 Oct; 8(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 15874878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of thin-layer preparations vs. conventional Pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study. Extended cytologic evaluation.
Hessling JJ; Raso DS; Schiffer B; Callicott J; Husain M; Taylor D
J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):880-6. PubMed ID: 11725731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep Papanicolaou test specimens increases sample adequacy and detection of significant cervicovaginal lesions.
Islam S; West AM; Saboorian MH; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 15098249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a comparative review of original and automated rescreen diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears with long term follow-up.
Stastny JF; Remmers RE; London WB; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Ryan M; Frable WJ
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 9438460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Liquid-based cervical cytology.
Klinkhamer PJ; Meerding WJ; Rosier PF; Hanselaar AG
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):263-71. PubMed ID: 14579292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening.
Lee KR; Ashfaq R; Birdsong GG; Corkill ME; McIntosh KM; Inhorn SL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 9241308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
