These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 996164)

  • 1. Olfactory bulb removal and response suppression in rats.
    Thorne BM; McDougal Y; Topping JS
    Physiol Behav; 1976 Aug; 17(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 996164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of neodecorticated rabbits in a free-operant situation.
    Oakley DA; Russell IS
    Physiol Behav; 1978 Feb; 20(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 662938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fixed interval responding by pigeons following damage to corpus striatal and limbic brain structures (paleostriatal comples and parolfactory lobe).
    Wesp R; Goodman I
    Physiol Behav; 1978 May; 20(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 684092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Renewal, resurgence, and alternative reinforcement context.
    Sweeney MM; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jul; 116():43-9. PubMed ID: 25936876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Omission training and extinction in rats with septal damage.
    Aaron M; Thorne BM
    Physiol Behav; 1975 Aug; 15(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 1187850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choice and contingency in the development of behavioral autonomy during instrumental conditioning.
    Kosaki Y; Dickinson A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jul; 36(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 20658864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of baseline reinforcement rate on operant ABA and ABC renewal.
    Berry MS; Sweeney MM; Odum AL
    Behav Processes; 2014 Oct; 108():87-93. PubMed ID: 25241305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditional engagement of medial frontal cortex during responding under uncertain reinforcement in rats: a paradigm for subjective behavior.
    Nalwa V; Rao PS
    Int J Neurosci; 2001; 108(3-4):291-6. PubMed ID: 11699195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response suppression in normal and septal rats.
    Atnip G; Hothersall D
    Physiol Behav; 1975 Oct; 15(5):417-21. PubMed ID: 1221449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative stereotypy of water-ingestive behavior induced by frontal cortical lesions in the rat.
    Crow LT; McWilliams LS
    Neuropsychologia; 1979; 17(3-4):393-9. PubMed ID: 574623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The neurotensin receptor agonist NT69L suppresses sucrose-reinforced operant behavior in the rat.
    Boules M; Iversen I; Oliveros A; Shaw A; Williams K; Robinson J; Fredrickson P; Richelson E
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1127(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 17113052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective olfactory system lesions in rats and changes in appetitive and aversive behavior.
    Sieck MH
    Physiol Behav; 1973 Apr; 10(4):731-9. PubMed ID: 4708985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resurgence in Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens.
    da Silva SP; Cançado CR; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():315-9. PubMed ID: 24462710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response elimination, reinforcement rate and resurgence of operant behavior.
    Cançado CR; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():91-102. PubMed ID: 23954832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) in female Roman high- (RHA-I) and low-avoidance (RLA-I) rats.
    Gómez MA; de la Torre L; Callejas-Aguilera JE; Lerma-Cabrera JM; Rosas JM; Escarabajal MA; Agüero A; Tobeña A; Fernández-Teruel A; Torres C
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 194(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 18692092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of relative and absolute reinforcement magnitude on operant responding.
    Campbell AB; Seiden LS
    Physiol Behav; 1974 May; 12(5):843-9. PubMed ID: 4837423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The partial reinforcement extinction effect: The proportion of trials reinforced during conditioning predicts the number of trials to extinction.
    Chan CKJ; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 30604994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Licking behavior of rats in relation to saccharin concentration and shifts in fixed-ratio reinforcement.
    Hulse SH
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1967 Dec; 64(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 6082880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Importance of traces of a preceding unreinforced stimulus to the formation of inhibitory conditioned reflexes in the rat].
    Belenkov NIu; Gracheva VV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1985; 35(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 3984496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.