145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9971862)
21. Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.
Schulzer M
Muscle Nerve; 1994 Jul; 17(7):815-9. PubMed ID: 8008012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic characteristics of tests: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios.
Carneiro AV
Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 May; 30(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21800483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology Part 4: everyday probabilities--nonbinary diagnostic tests.
Shin JJ; Stinnett SS; Randolph GW
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 149(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 23715687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Novel tests for evaluating two ROC curves under paired samples.
Hwang YT; Wang CC
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):501-517. PubMed ID: 28541824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Slopes of a receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood ratios for a diagnostic test.
Choi BC
Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 148(11):1127-32. PubMed ID: 9850136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices].
Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP
J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Fosgate GT
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1287-8; author reply 1288. PubMed ID: 15765500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve: principles and application in biology].
Delacour H; Servonnet A; Perrot A; Vigezzi JF; Ramirez JM
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15771972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: usefulness for clinical decision making and research.
Langlotz CP
Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 12832567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
Bowden SC; Loring DW
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of diagnostic tests using relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the differential positive rate. An example using the total serum bile acid concentration and the alanine aminotransferase activity in the diagnosis of canine hepatobiliary diseases.
Jensen AL; Poulsen JS
Zentralbl Veterinarmed A; 1992 Nov; 39(9):656-68. PubMed ID: 1455934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development and evaluation of classifiers.
Alonzo TA; Pepe MS
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():89-116. PubMed ID: 18450047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Simple statistical measures for diagnostic accuracy assessment.
Mandrekar JN
J Thorac Oncol; 2010 Jun; 5(6):763-4. PubMed ID: 20502268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Studies about diagnostic tests: interpreting the results].
Salech F; Mery V; Larrondo F; Rada G
Rev Med Chil; 2008 Sep; 136(9):1203-8. PubMed ID: 19030668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A toxicologist's guide to studying diagnostic tests.
Bailey B; Amre DK
Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2005; 43(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 15902791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The interpretation of test results.
Binder M; Dreiseitl S
J Cutan Med Surg; 2000 Jan; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10689223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
