These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9971922)

  • 1. Intermaxillary forces during activator treatment.
    Katsavrias EG; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9971922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition.
    Wieslander L
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6588755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 6594053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Vargervik K; Harvold EP
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 3862347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
    Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Pancherz H; Fackel U
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 2351206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.
    Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Ursi W
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of Class II division 1 patients.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Büyükerkmen A; Sari Z
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Feb; 25(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 12608728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
    Cura N; Saraç M
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
    Bilgiç F; Hamamci O; Başaran G
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance--a preliminary report.
    Weiland FJ; Bantleon HP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 7572845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of activator treatment changes.
    Hashim HA
    Aust Orthod J; 1991 Oct; 12(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 1843791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of intermaxillary forces in early treatment of maxillary deficient class III patients: results of a case series.
    Coscia G; Addabbo F; Peluso V; D'Ambrosio E
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e350-4. PubMed ID: 22421469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment.
    Teuscher U
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Sep; 74(3):258-75. PubMed ID: 281130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentofacial growth in orthodontically treated and untreated children with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). A comparison with Angle Class II division 1 subjects.
    Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S; Thilander B
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):357-73. PubMed ID: 8529749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.
    Illing HM; Morris DO; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 9825553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.