These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9972570)

  • 1. Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants.
    Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):850-60. PubMed ID: 9972570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners.
    Chatterjee M; Fu QJ; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1637-44. PubMed ID: 10738817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
    Bierer JA; Nye AD
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.
    McKay CM; Remine MD; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1514-24. PubMed ID: 11572362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Pulse Polarity on Thresholds and on Non-monotonic Loudness Growth in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Macherey O; Carlyon RP; Chatron J; Roman S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 18(3):513-527. PubMed ID: 28138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual interactions between electrodes using focused and monopolar cochlear stimulation.
    Marozeau J; McDermott HJ; Swanson BA; McKay CM
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Jun; 16(3):401-12. PubMed ID: 25742726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    Hear Res; 1985 May; 18(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 3840159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrical field imaging as a means to predict the loudness of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implant patients.
    Berenstein CK; Vanpoucke FJ; Mulder JJ; Mens LH
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):28-38. PubMed ID: 20946945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
    Steel MM; Abbasalipour P; Salloum CA; Hasek D; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of Gaussian noise on the threshold, dynamic range, and loudness of analogue cochlear implant stimuli.
    Morse RP; Morse PF; Nunn TB; Archer KA; Boyle P
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17160638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jul; 96(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 8064018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spectral loudness summation for electrical stimulation in cochlear implant users.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):818-27. PubMed ID: 26068301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea.
    Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jun; 79(6):1958-66. PubMed ID: 3722606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.