80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9972587)
1. [Assessment of clinical assessment reliability among researchers of a multicenter clinical trial].
Baca-García E; Díaz-Sastre C; Rico F; Sáiz Ruiz J
Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines; 1998; 26(6):358-62. PubMed ID: 9972587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Brief Suicide Questionnaire. Inter-rater reliability].
García-Nieto R; Parra Uribe I; Palao D; Lopez-Castroman J; Sáiz PA; García-Portilla MP; Saiz Ruiz J; Ibañez A; Tiana T; Durán Sindreu S; Perez Sola V; de Diego-Otero Y; Pérez-Costillas L; Fernández García-Andrade R; Saiz-González D; Jiménez Arriero MA; Navío Acosta M; Giner L; Guija JA; Escobar JL; Cervilla JA; Quesada M; Braquehais D; Blasco-Fontecilla H; Legido-Gil T; Aroca F; Baca-García E;
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment; 2012; 5(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 22854501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interrater reliability issues in multicenter trials, Part II: Statistical procedures used in Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #394.
Edson R; Lavori P; Tracy K; Adler LA; Rotrosen J
Psychopharmacol Bull; 1997; 33(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 9133752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sources of unreliability in depression ratings.
Kobak KA; Brown B; Sharp I; Levy-Mack H; Wells K; Ockun F; Williams JB
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Feb; 29(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 19142114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating rater competency for CNS clinical trials.
Targum SD
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Jun; 26(3):308-10. PubMed ID: 16702896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Response to Shen J, Kobak K, Zhao Y, et al. Use of remote centralized raters via live 2-way video ina multicenter clinical trial for schizophrenia. (J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;28:691-693).
Grunze HC; Höschl C; Montgomery SA; Sartorius N; Vieta E
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Aug; 29(4):409; author reply 409-10. PubMed ID: 19593194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.
Tate RL; McDonald S; Perdices M; Togher L; Schultz R; Savage S
Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 18(4):385-401. PubMed ID: 18576270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden scale in a multicenter trial for dystonia.
Krystkowiak P; du Montcel ST; Vercueil L; Houeto JL; Lagrange C; Cornu P; Blond S; Benabid AL; Pollak P; Vidailhet M;
Mov Disord; 2007 Apr; 22(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 17274034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning how to differ: agreement and reliability statistics in psychiatry.
Streiner DL
Can J Psychiatry; 1995 Mar; 40(2):60-6. PubMed ID: 7788619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rating scales, scales of measurement, issues of reliability: resolving some critical issues for clinicians and researchers.
Cicchetti D; Bronen R; Spencer S; Haut S; Berg A; Oliver P; Tyrer P
J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Aug; 194(8):557-64. PubMed ID: 16909062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percentage of inadequate phlebograms and observer agreement in thromboprophylactic multicenter trials using standardized methodology and central assessment.
Kälebo P; Ekman S; Lindbratt S; Eriksson BI; Pauli U; Zachrisson BE; Close P
Thromb Haemost; 1996 Dec; 76(6):893-6. PubMed ID: 8972007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interrater reliability issues in multicenter trials, Part I: Theoretical concepts and operational procedures used in Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #394.
Tracy K; Adler LA; Rotrosen J; Edson R; Lavori P
Psychopharmacol Bull; 1997; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 9133751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use?
Vatnaland T; Vatnaland J; Friis S; Opjordsmoen S
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2007 Apr; 115(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 17355524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The validity and reliability of the WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN Thai Version): Mood Disorders Section.
Krisanaprakornkit T; Paholpak S; Piyavhatkul N
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Feb; 89(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 16579007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the reliability of multiple assessments of PTSD symptomatology: multiple examiners, one patient.
Cicchetti D; Fontana A; Showalter D
Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):269-80. PubMed ID: 19282035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel technique to evaluate fluctuations of mood: implications for evaluating course and treatment effects in bipolar/affective disorders.
Sree Hari Rao V; Raghvendra Rao C; Yeragani VK
Bipolar Disord; 2006 Oct; 8(5 Pt 1):453-66. PubMed ID: 17042883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Test-retest reliability of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale in patients with early Parkinson's disease: results from a multicenter clinical trial.
Siderowf A; McDermott M; Kieburtz K; Blindauer K; Plumb S; Shoulson I;
Mov Disord; 2002 Jul; 17(4):758-63. PubMed ID: 12210871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Observer variation in the diagnosis of thyroid disorders. Criteria for and impact on diagnostic decision-making.
Jarløv AE
Dan Med Bull; 2000 Nov; 47(5):328-39. PubMed ID: 11155660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of reliability in the clinical evaluation of depressive symptoms among multiple investigators in a multicenter clinical trial.
Baca-García E; Blanco C; Sáiz-Ruiz J; Rico F; Diaz-Sastre C; Cicchetti DV
Psychiatry Res; 2001 Jun; 102(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 11408055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
