These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9972789)

  • 1. Chromosome aberrations induced by light ions: Monte Carlo simulations based on a mechanistic model.
    Ballarini F; Merzagora M; Monforti F; Durante M; Gialanella G; Grossi GF; Pugliese M; Ottolenghi A
    Int J Radiat Biol; 1999 Jan; 75(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 9972789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Models of chromosome aberration induction: an example based on radiation track structure.
    Ballarini F; Ottolenghi A
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 104(1-4):149-56. PubMed ID: 15162029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proximity effects in chromosome aberration induction: Dependence on radiation quality, cell type and dose.
    Tello Cajiao JJ; Carante MP; Bernal Rodriguez MA; Ballarini F
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2018 Apr; 64():45-52. PubMed ID: 29494834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chromosome aberrations as biomarkers of radiation exposure: modelling basic mechanisms.
    Ballarini F; Ottolenghi A
    Adv Space Res; 2003; 31(6):1557-68. PubMed ID: 12971411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A model of chromosome aberration induction: applications to space research.
    Ballarini F; Ottolenghi A
    Radiat Res; 2005 Oct; 164(4 Pt 2):567-70. PubMed ID: 16187789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer simulation of data on chromosome aberrations produced by X rays or alpha particles and detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Chen AM; Lucas JN; Simpson PJ; Griffin CS; Savage JR; Brenner DJ; Hlatky LR; Sachs RK
    Radiat Res; 1997 Nov; 148(5 Suppl):S93-101. PubMed ID: 9355862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Track structure based modelling of chromosome aberrations after photon and alpha-particle irradiation.
    Friedland W; Kundrát P
    Mutat Res; 2013 Aug; 756(1-2):213-23. PubMed ID: 23811166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Induction of chromosome aberrations in human cells by charged particles.
    Wu H; Durante M; George K; Yang TC
    Radiat Res; 1997 Nov; 148(5 Suppl):S102-7. PubMed ID: 9355863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinetics of the formation of chromosome aberrations in X-irradiated human lymphocytes, using PCC and FISH.
    Darroudi F; Fomina J; Meijers M; Natarajan AT
    Mutat Res; 1998 Aug; 404(1-2):55-65. PubMed ID: 9729276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computational model of chromosome aberration yield induced by high- and low-LET radiation exposures.
    Ponomarev AL; George K; Cucinotta FA
    Radiat Res; 2012 Jun; 177(6):727-37. PubMed ID: 22490019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proximity effects in chromosome aberration induction by low-LET ionizing radiation.
    Tello Cajiao JJ; Carante MP; Bernal Rodriguez MA; Ballarini F
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2017 Oct; 58():38-46. PubMed ID: 28863396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model of chromosome aberration induction and chronic myeloid leukaemia incidence at low doses.
    Ballarini F; Ottolenghi A
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2004 Sep; 43(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 15309385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rejoining and misrejoining of radiation-induced chromatin breaks. I. experiments with human lymphocytes.
    Durante M; George K; Wu H; Yang TC
    Radiat Res; 1996 Mar; 145(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 8927694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of track structure on the understanding of relative biological effectiveness for induction of chromosomal exchanges in human lymphocytes.
    Moiseenko VV; Edwards AA; Nikjoo H; Prestwich WV
    Radiat Res; 1997 Feb; 147(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 9008213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cell type-specific quantitative predictions of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations: a computer model approach.
    Kreth G; Pazhanisamy SK; Hausmann M; Cremer C
    Radiat Res; 2007 May; 167(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 17474788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of radiation quality on the spectrum of induced chromosome exchange aberrations.
    Boei JJ; Vermeulen S; Mullenders LH; Natarajan AT
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2001 Aug; 77(8):847-57. PubMed ID: 11571018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements of metaphase and interphase chromosome aberrations transmitted through early cell replication rounds in human lymphocytes exposed to low-LET protons and high-LET 12C ions.
    Manti L; Durante M; Grossi G; Ortenzia O; Pugliese M; Scampoli P; Gialanella G
    Mutat Res; 2006 Apr; 596(1-2):151-65. PubMed ID: 16460768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A model for interphase chromosomes and evaluation of radiation-induced aberrations.
    Holley WR; Mian IS; Park SJ; Rydberg B; Chatterjee A
    Radiat Res; 2002 Nov; 158(5):568-80. PubMed ID: 12385634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. LET dependence of yield ratios of radiation-induced intra- and interchromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes.
    Bauchinger M; Schmid E
    Int J Radiat Biol; 1998 Jul; 74(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 9687971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative biological effectiveness of high linear energy transfer α-particles for the induction of DNA-double-strand breaks, chromosome aberrations and reproductive cell death in SW-1573 lung tumour cells.
    Franken NA; Hovingh S; Ten Cate R; Krawczyk P; Stap J; Hoebe R; Aten J; Barendsen GW
    Oncol Rep; 2012 Mar; 27(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 22200791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.